Title
Republic vs. Glasgow Credit and Collection Services, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 170281
Decision Date
Jan 18, 2008
The Republic sought civil forfeiture of Glasgow's funds under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The trial court dismissed the case, but the Supreme Court reversed, ruling proper venue, sufficient complaint, no failure to prosecute, and allowing service by publication. Case remanded for further proceedings.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 170281)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Subject Matter
    • Petitioner: Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
    • Respondents: Glasgow Credit and Collection Services, Inc. (Glasgow) and Citystate Savings Bank, Inc. (CSBI).
    • Cause: Civil forfeiture of bank deposits under R.A. 9160, as amended (Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001).
  • Procedural History
    • July 18, 2003 – AMLC filed complaint for civil forfeiture in RTC Manila (Civil Case No. 03-107319) and sought TRO/preliminary injunction.
    • July 21, 2003 – RTC Manila issued 72-hour TRO; case raffled to Branch 47.
    • August 8, 2003 – Writ of preliminary injunction issued.
    • October 8, 2003 – AMLC moved for alias summons and summons by publication upon failure to serve Glasgow.
    • October 15, 2003 – Trial court issued alias summons but did not rule on publication.
    • January 30, 2004 – Case archived for failure to serve alias summons.
    • May 31, 2004 – Case reinstated; court ordered service of alias summons within 15 days; deferred ruling on publication until return of alias summons.
    • June 30, 2004 – Alias summons returned unserved; Glasgow’s whereabouts unknown.
    • August 11, 2005 – AMLC moved to compel ruling on publication; Glasgow filed special-appearance motion to dismiss.
    • October 27, 2005 – RTC Branch 47 dismissed complaint for improper venue, insufficiency in form and substance, and failure to prosecute; lifted injunction; ordered release of funds.

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court correctly dismissed the AMLC’s complaint on grounds of:
    • Improper venue.
    • Insufficiency in form and substance.
    • Failure to prosecute.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.