Title
Republic vs. Galeno
Case
G.R. No. 215009
Decision Date
Jan 23, 2017
The Supreme Court rules that the burden of proof for correcting property area in Original Certificate of Title No. 46417 lies with the petitioner, whose evidence was deemed insufficient.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 215009)

Facts:

  • On September 2, 2003, Carmen Santorio Galeno (respondent) filed a petition for correction of the area of Lot No. 2285, covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 46417, in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Dumangas, Iloilo, Branch 68.
  • The respondent claimed co-ownership through a Deed of Sale dated July 6, 1962, and asserted that the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) approved the survey and subdivision of the property, supported by an Approved Subdivision Plan.
  • A resurvey revealed a discrepancy: the title indicated 20,948 square meters, while a DENR certification showed 21,298 square meters.
  • To resolve this inconsistency, the respondent sought to correct the area, claiming to have notified adjoining owners.
  • The RTC allowed ex parte evidence presentation due to the absence of opposition and granted the petition on October 13, 2006, directing the Register of Deeds of Iloilo to amend the title.
  • The Republic of the Philippines (petitioner), represented by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing improper notification of adjoining owners.
  • The RTC denied the motion on January 22, 2007, confirming that a Notice of Hearing had been sent to the adjoining owners.
  • The petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which upheld the RTC's ruling on June 27, 2013, stating the respondent proved the correct area based on DENR records.
  • The petitioner's motion for reconsideration was denied on September 17, 2014, leading to a petition for review on certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition, reversing the Decision of the Court of Appeals and dismissing Carmen Santorio Galeno's petition for c...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court found the evidence presented by the respondent insufficient for correcting the area of the property.
  • The Court scrutinized the documents, including a DENR certification stating the area as 21,298 square meters, but noted the lack of probative weight due to the absence of testimony fr...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.