Title
Republic vs. Asia Pacific Integrated Steel Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 192100
Decision Date
Mar 12, 2014
Expropriation of 2,024 sqm for NLEX expansion; dispute over just compensation (P1,300/sqm) remanded for proper valuation based on reliable data, legal interest reduced to 6%.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 192100)

Facts:

  • Background and Parties
    • Asia Pacific Integrated Steel Corporation (respondent) owns a 17,175-sqm property in Sta. Monica, San Simon, Pampanga (TCT No. 271813-R).
    • Republic of the Philippines (petitioner), through the Toll Regulatory Board (TRB), instituted expropriation on March 1, 2002 over 2,024 sqm for the San Simon Interchange of the NLEX Project.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • Petitioner filed an ex parte motion for writ of possession, depositing ₱607,200.00 (100% of BIR zonal value) with LBP; RTC granted possession on March 19, 2002.
    • Respondent contested TRB’s authority and offered compensation, arguing just compensation was ₱1,500/sqm (₱3,036,000.00) based on fair market value.
    • Parties agreed to submit valuation to three commissioners (Municipal Assessor as Chair, Clerk of Court, Register of Deeds).
    • On June 9, 2004, commissioners reported opinion values of ₱1,000–1,500/sqm for industrial land, citing conversion order.
    • Ocular inspection on September 23, 2004 noted a toll plaza, exact area of taking (2,021 sqm), swampy adjacent remnant.
    • RTC found ₱1,300/sqm fair, awarded ₱2,024,000.00 less deposit, plus 12% legal interest from March 21, 2002, costs, and cleared encumbrances.
  • Appellate History
    • Court of Appeals (July 21, 2009) affirmed RTC’s valuation but reduced interest to 6% per annum; denied reconsideration (April 28, 2010).
    • Petitioner filed Rule 45 petition in the Supreme Court, claiming improper valuation methodology and excessive award.

Issues:

  • Primary Legal Questions
    • Whether the RTC based its determination of just compensation on the factors enumerated in Section 5 of R.A. 8974.
    • Whether reliance on an unsubstantiated commissioners’ report without documentary evidence complies with the law.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.