Case Digest (G.R. No. 154705) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In The Republic of Indonesia, His Excellency Ambassador Soeratmin, and Minister Counsellor Azhari Kasim v. James Vinzon, doing business under the name and style of Vinzon Trade and Services, G.R. No. 154705, decided on June 26, 2003, petitioners, represented by Counsellor Siti Partinah, entered into a Maintenance Agreement in August 1995 with respondent James Vinzon, sole proprietor of Vinzon Trade and Services, for the upkeep of air conditioning units, generator sets, electrical facilities, water heaters, and water motor pumps at the Indonesian Embassy Main Building, its Annex, and the official residence (Wisma Duta) of Ambassador Soeratmin. The four-year agreement provided for automatic renewal unless either party gave thirty days’ written notice before expiration. Prior to August 1999, petitioners advised respondent that renewal would depend on the incoming Chief of Administration, Minister Counsellor Azhari Kasim. When Kasim assumed office in March 2000, he declared responde Case Digest (G.R. No. 154705) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Maintenance Agreement
- In August 1995, the Republic of Indonesia, through its Counsellor Siti Partinah, entered into a four-year Maintenance Agreement with James Vinzon, sole proprietor of Vinzon Trade and Services.
- The Agreement provided that Vinzon would maintain air conditioning units, generator sets, electrical facilities, water heaters, and water motor pumps at the Indonesian Embassy Main Building, Embassy Annex Building, and Wisma Duta (the Ambassador’s residence).
- It stipulated automatic renewal for successive four-year terms unless either party gave thirty days’ prior written notice of cancellation.
- Termination of the Agreement
- Prior to August 1999 (the date of expiration), petitioners allegedly informed respondent that renewal would be at the discretion of incoming Chief of Administration, Minister Counsellor Azhari Kasim.
- When Kasim assumed office in March 2000, he deemed respondent’s services unsatisfactory and non-compliant with contractual standards.
- On August 31, 2000, the Indonesian Embassy, by letter, formally terminated the Agreement; petitioners assert that respondent was also verbally notified earlier.
- Judicial Proceedings
- On December 15, 2000, respondent filed Civil Case No. 18203 before the RTC of Makati, Branch 145, for unlawful and arbitrary termination.
- Petitioners moved to dismiss on February 20, 2001, citing sovereign immunity (for the Republic of Indonesia) and diplomatic immunity (for Ambassador Soeratmin and Minister Counsellor Kasim).
- Respondent opposed on March 20, 2001, contending that the Maintenance Agreement’s choice-of-law and venue clause constituted an express waiver of immunity.
- On May 17, 2001, the RTC denied the Motion to Dismiss and likewise denied the subsequent motion for reconsideration.
- Petitioners elevated the matter to the Court of Appeals via petition for certiorari (CA-G.R. SP No. 66894), which, on May 30, 2002, denied relief and on August 16, 2002, denied reconsideration.
- Petitioners then filed this petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Whether the Republic of Indonesia waived its sovereign immunity by agreeing that “any legal action arising out of this Maintenance Agreement shall be settled according to the laws of the Philippines and by the proper court of Makati City.”
- Whether Ambassador Soeratmin and Minister Counsellor Kasim enjoy immunity from civil suit in their private capacities under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)