Title
Re: Dacanay
Case
B.M. NO. 1678
Decision Date
Dec 17, 2007
A lawyer who reacquired Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 after losing it was allowed to resume law practice upon fulfilling specific conditions, including retaking the oath.
A

Case Digest (B.M. NO. 1678)

Facts:

  • Admission and Practice History
    • Petitioner Benjamin M. Dacanay was admitted to the Philippine Bar in March 1960.
    • He practiced law until December 1998, when he migrated to Canada for medical treatment.
  • Citizenship Changes and Reacquisition
    • Dacanay became a Canadian citizen in May 2004 to avail himself of Canada’s free medical aid program.
    • On July 14, 2006, he reacquired Philippine citizenship pursuant to RA 9225, taking his oath before the Philippine Consulate General in Toronto.
  • Petition to Resume Practice
    • Upon his return to the Philippines, petitioner filed a petition for leave to resume the practice of law, questioning whether he had lost his bar membership upon losing Philippine citizenship.
    • On October 16, 2007, the Office of the Bar Confidant reported that, under Rule 138, Section 2 of the Rules of Court, petitioner again met all qualifications for bar membership and recommended allowing him to resume practice, conditioned on retaking the lawyer’s oath.

Issues:

  • Effect of Loss of Citizenship on Bar Membership
    • Does loss of Philippine citizenship upon naturalization in Canada ipso jure terminate Dacanay’s bar membership and his privilege to practice law?
  • Impact of Reacquisition of Citizenship under RA 9225
    • Does reacquisition of Philippine citizenship under RA 9225 automatically restore bar membership and the privilege to practice law, or are further Supreme Court requirements necessary?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.