Title
Quinto vs. Andres
Case
G.R. No. 155791
Decision Date
Mar 16, 2005
A boy drowned in a culvert; respondents were acquitted of homicide due to insufficient evidence, extinguishing civil liability as no criminal act was proven.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 155791)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • On November 13, 1995, at around 7:30 a.m., eleven-year-old Edison Garcia and his playmate Wilson Quinto, also eleven, were at Barangay San Rafael, Tarlac.
    • Respondents Dante Andres and Randyver Pacheco were observed near a drainage culvert.
    • Andres and Pacheco invited Wilson to go fishing inside the drainage culvert; Wilson agreed, while Garcia stayed outside due to darkness.
    • Pacheco carried a flashlight; he, Andres, and Wilson entered the culvert covered by a concrete drain, water about a foot deep.
  • After some time, Pacheco exited holding a fish and then left without saying anything.
    • Andres came out, went back inside, and emerged carrying Wilson’s lifeless body.
    • Andres laid Wilson’s body on the grassy area. Garcia fled the scene.
  • Andres informed Wilson’s mother, Melba Quinto, of Wilson’s death.
    • Melba rushed to the scene, followed by Andres.
    • Wilson’s body was buried without autopsy. No police criminal complaint was filed immediately.
    • Two weeks later, NBI investigators took sworn statements from Pacheco, Garcia, and Melba.
  • Pacheco denied being inside the drainage system with Wilson and Andres; claimed he saw Wilson already dead while passing by on his carabao.
  • On February 29, 1996, Wilson’s body was exhumed; NBI medico-legal Dr. Dominic Aguda performed an autopsy.
    • Findings included: embalmed body, hematoma 14 x 7 cm on occipital scalp, abrasions on right face and left forearm, congested laryngo-tracheal lumina with muddy particles, heavy lungs with bloody froth, autolyzed brain and stomach.
    • Cause of death: Asphyxia by drowning with contributory traumatic head injuries.
  • NBI filed homicide by dolo criminal complaint against Andres and Pacheco; probable cause was found. Information was filed in RTC of Tarlac.
    • Accusation: respondents conspired and feloniously caused Wilson’s death by assault inside the culvert.
  • During trial:
    • Testimony of Garcia and Dr. Aguda on medical findings and cause of death.
    • Dr. Aguda stated injuries could be due to blunt force or fall; drowning indicated by presence of mud in airway with no strangulation.
    • Respondents admitted prosecution’s pictures of drainage system.
  • Trial court granted demurrer to evidence citing insufficient evidence to prove respondents liable criminally; dismissed civil damages claim due to lack of preponderant evidence.
  • On appeal, CA affirmed trial court’s dismissal: acquittal based on non-commission of criminal act bars civil action arising therefrom.
  • Petitioner filed petition for review raising:
    • Whether extinction of criminal liability extinguishes civil liability.
    • Whether preponderant evidence exists to hold respondents civilly liable.
  • Petitioner argued trial court erred by using mere speculations, ignoring Dr. Aguda’s findings, and overlooking suspicious behavior of respondents after incident.
  • Respondents maintained absence of evidence to prove criminal or civil liability.

Issues:

  • Does the extinction of respondents’ criminal liability also extinguish their civil liability?
  • Is there preponderant evidence to hold respondents civilly liable for Wilson Quinto’s death?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.