Case Digest (G.R. No. 156125)
Facts:
In the case of Elias C. Quibal and Antonio U. Deniega vs. The Hon. Sandiganbayan (Second Division) and People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 109991, decided on May 22, 1995, the petitioners, Elias C. Quibal and Antonio U. Deniega, served as the mayor and treasurer, respectively, of the municipality of Palapag in Northern Samar. They, along with Eduardo C. Guevarra, a private contractor, were charged under Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, also known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. The accusation stemmed from actions taken on February 16, 1988, when the municipal government entered into a contract with Floters Construction, represented by Guevarra, for the construction of a public market for a total price of P652,562.60. During the project period, the mayor and treasurer issued checks amounting to P650,000.00 to the contractor, despite the project being only 36.24% complete by the time of an audit on August 31, 1988. The actual cost of the completed work was assesCase Digest (G.R. No. 156125)
Facts:
- Parties and Charges
- The case involves petitioners Elias C. Quibal, Municipal Mayor of Palapag, Northern Samar, and Antonio U. Deniega, Municipal Treasurer of Palapag, Northern Samar, charged with the violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act).
- A private individual, Eduardo C. Guevarra—representing Floters Construction—was also implicated but remains at large; only Quibal and Deniega were arrested, tried, and convicted.
- Contract and Project Details
- On November 27, 1987, the municipality of Palapag, represented by its OIC vice-mayor Teodoro C. Bello, executed a contract with Floters Construction, represented by Guevarra, for the construction of a municipal public market.
- The contract stipulated a completion period of 100 days for a project priced at P652,562.60, with payments to be released in accordance with the percentage of work accomplished.
- Between February 16, 1988 and April 12, 1988, Quibal and Deniega issued four checks totaling P650,000.00 to the contractor, even though evidence later showed that only 36.24% of the work had been completed.
- Irregularities Noted in the Construction and Disbursement Process
- A COA Special Audit Team, on August 31, 1988, inspected the progress of the municipal market’s construction and found that the work was significantly behind schedule.
- The audit revealed that the actual cost of the work completed was only P301,746.65, while unfinished portions were valued at P348,235.35.
- The contractor had been fully paid (P650,000.00) despite the incomplete construction, and supporting documents exhibited numerous irregularities:
- Disbursement vouchers (Exhibits “E” to “E-3”) were improperly filled or unsigned.
- Payments exceeding the P200,000.00 threshold were not accompanied by the required Certificate of Acceptance, contravening COA rules.
- Subsequent Actions and Developments
- In January 1989, Provincial Auditor Marissa Bayona submitted an inspection report recommending legal action against the public officials and the contractor.
- On April 7, 1989, the Ombudsman formally notified Mayor Quibal of the charges filed against him.
- Despite a request by Quibal on May 12, 1989 for a re-audit of cost valuation, this appeal was denied.
- In November 1989, the construction resumed with available materials; the market was eventually completed in December 1989 and began operations with market stall leasing in January 1990.
- Testimonies and Defense by the Accused
- Treasurer Deniega testified that he disbursed:
- P340,000.00 on February 16, 1988 (supported by voucher Exhibit “F-3”),
- P60,000.00 on February 26, 1988 (voucher Exhibit “F-2”),
- P200,000.00 on March 14, 1988 (voucher Exhibit “F”), and
- P50,000.00 on April 22, 1988 (voucher Exhibit “F-1”).
- Deniega claimed that the complete and signed vouchers with the necessary supporting documents had been properly submitted to the Office of the Provincial Auditor.
- Mayor Quibal defended his actions by arguing that the additional payments allowed the contractor to purchase construction materials at lower prices and that the unused stockpile—valued at approximately P348,235.35—should be credited against the total payment.
- Court Decision on the Merits
- The Sandiganbayan (Second Division) found Quibal and Deniega guilty beyond reasonable doubt as co-principals in the commission of the offense.
- The court held that the premature and excessive releases of funds, disregarding the contractual stipulation of payment based upon the percentage of work accomplished, constituted manifest partiality and evident bad faith.
- The decision imposed penalties including imprisonment (from 6 years and 1 month to 10 years and 1 day), perpetual disqualification from public office, and the indemnification of P348,345.35 to the municipal government.
Issues:
- Alleged Violation of Due Process
- Petitioners argued that their constitutional right to due process was violated by not allowing a re-examination and re-audit of a project that was completed and already in use.
- They contended that reconsideration of the project's cost and the proper valuation of unused materials could have exonerated them.
- Challenge on the Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
- Petitioners maintained that the evidence failed to prove that they acted with:
- Manifest partiality,
- Evident bad faith, and
- Gross inexcusable negligence.
- They further asserted that no undue injury was caused to the government since the municipal market was eventually completed, albeit with a delayed timeline and apparent contractual breaches.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)