Title
Quiambao vs. Bamba
Case
A.C. No. 6708
Decision Date
Aug 25, 2005
A lawyer was suspended for one year for representing conflicting interests by filing a case against a client while serving as her counsel, violating the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 6708)

Facts:

  • Felicitas S. Quiambao, president of Allied Investigation Bureau, Inc. (AIB), engaged Atty. Nestor A. Bamba for legal services.
  • Atty. Bamba represented Quiambao in an ejectment case against Spouses Santiago and Florita Torroba, filed on December 29, 2000.
  • Quiambao paid attorney's fees for the legal services provided.
  • After resigning from AIB, Atty. Bamba filed a replevin and damages complaint against Quiambao on June 14, 2001, while still representing her in the ejectment case.
  • Quiambao accused Atty. Bamba of disloyalty, alleging he encouraged her to start a new security agency, Quiambao Risk Management Specialists, Inc. (QRMSI), where he would be a silent partner.
  • Atty. Bamba allegedly conspired with Quiambao's brother to create another agency, San Esteban Security Services, Inc. (SESSI).
  • Atty. Bamba admitted to representing both parties but denied being Quiambao's personal lawyer.
  • The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) found Atty. Bamba guilty of representing conflicting interests and initially recommended a one-year suspension, which was later reduced to a stern reprimand.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court found Atty. Nestor A. Bamba guilty of serious misconduct for representing conflicting interests.
  • The Court imposed a one-year suspension from the practice of law, rejecting ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted the prohibition against representing conflicting interests as per Rule 15.03, Canon 5 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
  • Atty. Bamba's simultaneous representation of Quiambao and AIB constituted a clear conflict of interest.
  • The Court dismissed Bamba's claim of having the complainant's consent, noting the absence of evidence for full disclosure and written consent from both parties.
  • The essence of the lawyer-client relationship is based on trust; any appearance of treachery undermines this foundation.
  • Th...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.