Title
Supreme Court
Puerto Del Sol Palawan, Inc. vs. Gabaen
Case
G.R. No. 212607
Decision Date
Mar 27, 2019
PDSPI contested NCIP's denial of its appeal over ancestral land dispute; SC ruled in favor, citing exhaustion of remedies and fresh period rule for appeal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 212607)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Origin and Nature of the Dispute
    • On August 15, 2011, private respondent Andrew Abis filed with NCIP RHO IV Complaint No. 038-RIV-11 for “Unauthorized and Unlawful Intrusion,” alleging that he and the Cuyunen Tribe occupied ancestral lands in Sitio Orbin, Brgy. Concepcion, Busuanga, Palawan since time immemorial.
    • Abis claimed that petitioner Puerto Del Sol Palawan, Inc. (PDSPI), through Michael Batchelor, intruded into these lands, posted “no trespassing” signs, deployed armed guards, destroyed crops, and developed the Puerto del Sol Resort therein.
  • Proceedings Before NCIP RHO IV
    • On August 22, 2011, RHO IV issued a TRO in favor of Abis. PDSPI filed its Answer on September 8, 2011, denying any overlap with ancestral domain.
    • After hearings, RHO IV rendered its Decision on November 22, 2012, ruling that the resort sits on Cuyunen ancestral lands and that PDSPI intruded unlawfully; PDSPI received the Decision on November 29, 2012.
  • Post-Decision Motions and Appeals
    • PDSPI filed a Motion for Reconsideration on December 10, 2012 (received December 13, 2012); RHO IV denied it by Order dated December 18, 2012 (received December 21, 2012).
    • PDSPI then filed its Memorandum on Appeal on January 7, 2013; RHO IV denied due course by Order of January 14, 2013, as purportedly late.
    • Aggrieved, PDSPI filed a certiorari petition with the CA on March 4, 2013 (CA-G.R. SP No. 129036); the CA denied it outright on April 3, 2013, and likewise denied PDSPI’s motion for reconsideration on May 20, 2014.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals correctly invoked the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies in dismissing PDSPI’s petition for certiorari assailing RHO IV’s January 14, 2013 Order.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.