Title
Provincial Government of Cavite vs. CQM Management, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 248033
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2020
CQM Management seeks injunction against Cavite tax delinquency sale; properties exempt under RA 7916, tax collection prescribed, laches bars enforcement.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 248033)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of the Case
    • CQM Management, Inc. (respondent) filed a petition for injunction against the Provincial Government of Cavite and the Provincial Treasurer of Cavite (petitioners) to stop a tax delinquency sale of properties previously owned by Maxon Systems Philippines, Inc. (Maxon) and Ultimate Electronic Components, Inc. (Ultimate).
    • The properties were located in the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) in Rosario, Cavite.
  • Acquisition of Properties
    • On December 1, 2004, Philippine Investment One (SPV-AMC) Inc. (PI One) acquired non-performing loans from Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC), secured by real estate mortgages over the Maxon and Ultimate properties.
    • Maxon's property had an outstanding obligation of P30,000,000.00, while Ultimate's property had an outstanding obligation of P10,500,000.00.
    • PI One foreclosed on the properties, and the Maxon property was sold to PI One, while the Ultimate property was sold to CQM Management, Inc.
    • PI One later assigned its rights over the Maxon property to CQM Management, Inc., making the respondent the owner of both properties.
  • Tax Delinquency Issue
    • Maxon and Ultimate had unpaid real property taxes:
      • Maxon: P15,888,089.09 (2000-2013).
      • Ultimate: P6,238,407.76 (1997-2013).
    • The Provincial Treasurer of Cavite issued a tax assessment and warrant of levy, scheduling a public auction for December 10, 2014.
    • The auction was halted by a preliminary writ of injunction issued by the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
  • RTC Ruling
    • The RTC ruled in favor of CQM Management, Inc., stating that the properties were exempt from real property taxes under Section 24 of RA 7916 (Special Economic Zone Act).
    • The RTC also cited equity considerations, including laches and estoppel, and made the injunction permanent.
  • CA Ruling
    • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's decision, ruling that CQM Management, Inc. was not liable for the unpaid taxes as it was not the owner or beneficial user of the properties during the tax accrual periods.
    • The CA also held that the properties were exempt under RA 7916 and that some of the taxes had already prescribed under Section 270 of the Local Government Code (RA 7160).

Issues:

  • Whether CQM Management, Inc. is liable for the unpaid real property taxes of Maxon and Ultimate.
  • Whether the properties are exempt from real property taxes under Section 24 of RA 7916.
  • Whether the collection of some of the unpaid taxes had already prescribed.
  • Whether the petitioners are barred by laches and estoppel from collecting the taxes.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.