Case Digest (G.R. No. 40766)
Facts:
- The case involves an appeal by defendants Enrique T. Yu Chengco and The Yek Tong Lin Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. from an order of the Court of First Instance of Manila.
- The defendants argue that they were not given notice and that the order was void.
- The case revolves around the administration and mortgage of the vessel Y. Sontua.
- The vessel Y. Sontua was mortgaged by its owner, Yu Biao Sontua y Cia., to Enrique T. Yu Chengco for P50,000.
- Yu Biao Sontua y Cia. later mortgaged the vessel again to W. S. Price for the same amount, with the consent of Yu Chengco.
- Price filed a complaint against Yu Biao Sontua y Cia. and others, seeking the attachment of the vessel due to the debtor's failure to comply with the mortgage conditions.
- Price filed a bond of P100,000 to answer for the prosecution of the action, return of the property, and payment of any sums recovered against him.
- Yu Chengco assigned his mortgage rights to Pelagio Yu Singco, who was later substituted as plaintiff in place of Price.
- This assignment was not recorded in the case record.
- Price also assigned his rights as a first mortgage creditor to Yu Singco.
- The trial court entered a judgment in favor of Yu Singco and ordered the payment of certain sums by Yu Biao Sontua y Cia.
- The vessel Y. Sontua was administered by Price and Yu Singco during the case.
- Price filed a motion to be relieved from liability and for the cancellation of his bond, stating that Yu Singco continued to administer the vessel and had purchased all his rights and responsibilities.
- Yu Singco rendered an accounting of his administration, showing a profit.
- The court granted Price's motion and canceled his bond.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the trial court, finding ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The failure to serve notice of a motion upon a defendant, whose rights have been transferred to the plaintiff without recording the tra...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 40766)
Facts:
This case, entitled "Price v. Yu Chengco," involves an appeal made by defendants Yu Chengco and The Yek Tong Lin Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. from an order of the Court of First Instance of Manila. The order relieved the former plaintiff, W. S. Price, from liability arising from the administration of the vessel Y. Sontua and cancelled the bond filed by him for the attachment of said vessel. The defendants argue that they were not given notice of the motion and that the order was void.
Issue:
The main issue raised in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendants' motion for lack of notice and in cancelling the bond filed by the plaintiff.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirms the trial court's decision, stating that the lack of notice is a technical error and cannot be a ground for revoking the order.
Ratio:
The court's decision is based on the fact that the lack of notice did not prejudice the defendants and that the liability of the bond filed by...