Title
Presley vs. Bel-Air Village Association, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 86774
Decision Date
Aug 21, 1991
A residential property leased for commercial use in Bel-Air Village, Makati, sparked a legal dispute over deed restrictions, reclassification as a commercial zone, and unpaid association dues, resolved in favor of the petitioner.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 86774)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • Bel-Air Village Association, Inc. (BAVA) is a homeowners’ association formed to enforce deed restrictions annotated in Transfer Certificate of Title No. 73616 over lots in Bel-Air Village, Makati.
    • Teofilo and Rosario Almendras (both deceased and substituted by their lessee Enedina Presley) were the registered owners of a house and lot at 102 Jupiter Street, Bel-Air Village; the deed restrictions required the lot to be used only for residential purposes.
    • Enedina Presley, as lessee and operator, conducted a hot pan de sal store on the premises.
  • Procedural History
    • On February 9, 1981, BAVA filed a complaint for specific performance, damages, and a preliminary injunction against the Almendrases for (a) violating the residential‐use restriction and (b) non-payment of association dues and assessments amounting to ₱3,803.55.
    • The Regional Trial Court granted a permanent injunction enjoining any commercial use of the property and ordered defendants to pay (a) ₱3,803.55 plus legal interest from February 9, 1981, and (b) ₱4,500.00 as attorney’s fees, jointly and severally.
    • On November 28, 1988, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision in toto; its motion for reconsideration was denied on January 20, 1989.
    • Enedina Presley filed a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court, raising (a) conflict with the consolidated Sangalang en banc decisions; (b) lack of factual basis for solidary liability for unpaid dues; and (c) lack of basis for attorney’s fees. Presley died on January 4, 1991, and was substituted by her heirs.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision conflicts with the Supreme Court’s consolidated en banc decisions (Sangalang, G.R. No. 71169, et al., Dec. 22, 1988) regarding Bel-Air Village deed restrictions.
  • Whether the petitioner may be solidarily liable with the Almendrases for unpaid association dues.
  • Whether the petitioner may be solidarily liable for attorney’s fees.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.