Case Digest (G.R. No. 86774) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Enedina Presley v. Bel-Air Village Association, Inc. and Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 86774, August 21, 1991), Bel-Air Village Association, Inc. (“BAVA”) sued Teofilo and Rosario Almendras (both now deceased and represented by petitioner Enedina Presley, their lessee) before the Makati Regional Trial Court for specific performance and damages with preliminary injunction. The Almendrases were registered owners of a house and lot at 102 Jupiter Street, Bel-Air Village, Makati, subject to deed restrictions (TCT No. 73616) limiting its use to residential purposes. BAVA alleged that Presley operated a “Hot Pan de Sal Store” on the property in violation of these restrictions and that the Almendrases owed unpaid association dues amounting to ₱3,803.55 as of November 3, 1980. The trial court permanently enjoined commercial use of the lot, ordered payment of the dues with interest from February 9, 1981, and awarded ₱4,500 as attorney’s fees. The Court of Appeals affirmed on November 28, Case Digest (G.R. No. 86774) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background
- Bel-Air Village Association, Inc. (BAVA) is a homeowners’ association formed to enforce deed restrictions annotated in Transfer Certificate of Title No. 73616 over lots in Bel-Air Village, Makati.
- Teofilo and Rosario Almendras (both deceased and substituted by their lessee Enedina Presley) were the registered owners of a house and lot at 102 Jupiter Street, Bel-Air Village; the deed restrictions required the lot to be used only for residential purposes.
- Enedina Presley, as lessee and operator, conducted a hot pan de sal store on the premises.
- Procedural History
- On February 9, 1981, BAVA filed a complaint for specific performance, damages, and a preliminary injunction against the Almendrases for (a) violating the residential‐use restriction and (b) non-payment of association dues and assessments amounting to ₱3,803.55.
- The Regional Trial Court granted a permanent injunction enjoining any commercial use of the property and ordered defendants to pay (a) ₱3,803.55 plus legal interest from February 9, 1981, and (b) ₱4,500.00 as attorney’s fees, jointly and severally.
- On November 28, 1988, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision in toto; its motion for reconsideration was denied on January 20, 1989.
- Enedina Presley filed a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court, raising (a) conflict with the consolidated Sangalang en banc decisions; (b) lack of factual basis for solidary liability for unpaid dues; and (c) lack of basis for attorney’s fees. Presley died on January 4, 1991, and was substituted by her heirs.
Issues:
- Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision conflicts with the Supreme Court’s consolidated en banc decisions (Sangalang, G.R. No. 71169, et al., Dec. 22, 1988) regarding Bel-Air Village deed restrictions.
- Whether the petitioner may be solidarily liable with the Almendrases for unpaid association dues.
- Whether the petitioner may be solidarily liable for attorney’s fees.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)