Title
Posadas vs. Ombudsman
Case
G.R. No. 131492
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2000
The court ruled that the warrantless arrest of two student suspects by university officials and a lawyer was illegal due to lack of probable cause for obstruction of justice charges.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 131492)

Facts:

  • Dennis Venturina, a member of the Sigma Rho fraternity, was killed during a rumble on December 8, 1994.
  • Chancellor Roger Posadas of U.P. Diliman requested NBI assistance to identify those responsible for Venturina's death.
  • On December 12, 1994, NBI agents attempted to arrest Francis Carlo Taparan and Raymundo Narag, members of the Scintilla Juris fraternity, based on eyewitness identifications.
  • The suspects were at the U.P. Police Station for a peace talk at the time of the attempted arrest.
  • Posadas and others intervened, arguing the NBI lacked arrest warrants, and assured the suspects would be presented to the NBI the next day.
  • Criminal charges were later filed against the suspects, and Dizon lodged a complaint against Posadas and others for violating P.D. No. 1829.
  • The Ombudsman ordered prosecution despite a recommendation for dismissal from the Special Prosecutor's Office.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled negatively on both issues.
  • The attempted arrest by the NBI was deemed illegal due to the absence of a warrant.
  • There was no probab...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Article III, Section 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution mandates that no arrest can occur without a warrant issued by a judge after establishing probable cause.
  • The exceptions for warrantless arrests, as per Rule 113, Section 5 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, did not apply in this case.
  • The NBI's attempt to arrest the suspects occurred four days post-crime without personal knowledge of facts indicating guilt.
  • The Court distinguished this case from People v. Tonog, Jr., where immediate circumstances justified the arrest.
  • Eyewitness identification ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.