Title
Polangcos y Francisco vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 239866
Decision Date
Sep 11, 2019
A motorcyclist was acquitted after the Supreme Court ruled his search illegal, as his traffic violations were punishable only by fine, rendering seized drugs inadmissible.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 131856-57)

Facts:

  • Criminal Charge and Trial
    • An Information was filed on August 16, 2015, against Paulo Jackson F. Polangcos for violation of Section 11, Article II of RA 9165 (possession of 0.05 g of methamphetamine hydrochloride).
    • At arraignment, Polangcos pleaded not guilty. Subsequent pre-trial and trial on the merits followed before RTC Branch 263, Marikina City.
  • Prosecution’s Version
    • SPO2 Rey J. Juntanilla, on mobile patrol along J.P. Rizal St., Marikina City, spotted Polangcos driving a green RACAL motorcycle without a plate number and with expired OR/CR. He pursued and allegedly arrested Polangcos for the city ordinance violation.
    • During a body frisk—conducted before issuance of the ordinance violation receipt—a plastic sachet fell from Polangcos’ cap; it was marked “PJP-1 08-16-15,” inventoried before Brgy. Kagawad Rogel Santiago, and submitted via PO2 Diola to PCI Margarita Libres. Laboratory report confirmed the sachet contained methamphetamine hydrochloride.
  • Defense
    • The defense presented no witnesses or evidence; Polangcos was absent during the scheduled presentation of defense evidence.
    • The case was submitted for decision.
  • Lower Court Rulings
    • RTC Decision (Nov. 2, 2016): Convicted Polangcos of illegal possession of dangerous drugs; sentenced him to 12 years & 1 day to 20 years imprisonment and P300,000 fine, relying on presumption of regularity and a non-fatal chain-of-custody break.
    • CA Decision (Mar. 28, 2018) and Resolution (June 7, 2018): Affirmed conviction, holding that (a) all elements of the crime were proven; (b) preservation of evidentiary value outweighed technical chain-of-custody lapses; and (c) objections to warrantless arrest and search should have been raised before arraignment.

Issues:

  • Whether Polangcos was validly arrested and legally searched under the Constitution and RA 9165.
  • Whether the seized drug evidence was admissible, in light of chain-of-custody requirements and the exclusionary rule.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.