Title
Pioneer Insurance and Surety Corp. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 84197
Decision Date
Jul 28, 1989
Pioneer, after reinsurance, lacked standing to sue; Lim liable to reimburse contributors as no partnership formed. SC affirmed CA ruling.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 250584)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Transaction and Agreements
    • In May–July 1965, Jacob S. Lim (Lim), owner of Southern Air Lines (SAL), entered into a sales contract with Japan Domestic Airlines (JDA) for two DC-3A aircraft and spare parts for US$109,000, to be paid in installments.
    • Pioneer Insurance & Surety Corporation (Pioneer) issued Surety Bond No. 6639 in favor of JDA on Lim’s behalf.
    • Border Machinery & Heavy Equipment, Inc. (Bormaheco), Francisco and Modesto Cervantes (Cervanteses), and Constancio Maglana contributed funds (totaling ₱184,878.74), expecting shares in a proposed SAL corporation. They executed indemnity agreements in Pioneer’s favor.
    • Lim executed a chattel mortgage over the two aircraft as additional security for Pioneer’s suretyship; the deed was duly registered.
  • Default, Foreclosure, and Litigation
    • Lim defaulted on installment payments, prompting JDA to demand payment from Pioneer; Pioneer paid ₱298,626.12.
    • Pioneer foreclosed the chattel mortgage extrajudicially and realized ₱37,050 from the sale of mortgaged assets; third‐party claims were filed by Cervanteses and Maglana claiming co-ownership.
    • On July 19, 1966, Pioneer sued for judicial foreclosure with attachment and cross-claims by Bormaheco, Cervanteses, and Maglana for reimbursement and damages.
    • The trial court held Lim liable to Pioneer, dismissed Pioneer’s complaint against co-defendants, and awarded cross-plaintiffs reimbursement, moral damages, and attorney’s fees.
    • The Court of Appeals modified by dismissing Pioneer’s complaint entirely, affirmed Lim’s liability, and sustained awards to cross-plaintiffs.

Issues:

  • In G.R. No. 84197 (Pioneer v. CA & co-indemnitors)
    • Whether Pioneer, having been reimbursed by its reinsurer, is the real party in interest entitled to sue co-indemnitors.
    • Whether Pioneer may recover from co-indemnitors after foreclosure and collection of chattel mortgage proceeds.
  • In G.R. No. 84157 (Lim v. CA & co-investors)
    • Whether the contributors to Lim’s proposed corporation became de facto partners entitled to share losses and gains.
    • Whether Lim is liable to reimburse contributors under indemnity agreements or partnership principles.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.