Title
Pineda vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 261532
Decision Date
Dec 4, 2023
Rosalie Pineda was convicted of theft for misappropriating funds intended for bid documents but was ultimately found guilty of simple theft due to insufficient allegations of grave abuse of confidence, leading to a modified sentence.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 261532)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Charges and Arrest: Police Officer Arthur M. Pineda was charged with "Conniving with or Consenting to Evasion" under Article 223 of the Revised Penal Code for allegedly allowing a detention prisoner, Marcelino Nicolas, to escape while under his custody at a hospital.
  • Prosecution’s Version: Alicia Go Tan, the head nurse, testified that Nicolas escaped while Pineda was absent from his post for over two hours. Security logs confirmed Pineda’s absence during this period.
  • Defense’s Version: Pineda claimed he left his post to assist in a local robbery incident and was unaware of Nicolas’ escape until his return.

Issues:

  • Was the Information validly filed against Pineda under Section 4, Rule 112 of the Rules of Court?
  • Was Pineda duly informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him?
  • Was Pineda correctly convicted of Evasion through Negligence under Article 224 of the Revised Penal Code?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.