Title
Pilar vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 115245
Decision Date
Jul 11, 1995
Petitioner withdrew candidacy but fined for failing to file campaign finance statement; SC upheld COMELEC, ruling withdrawal doesn’t exempt compliance.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 115245)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Filing and withdrawal of candidacy
    • March 22, 1992: Petitioner Juanito C. Pilar filed his certificate of candidacy for member of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, Province of Isabela.
    • March 25, 1992: Petitioner withdrew his certificate of candidacy.
  • Administrative proceedings before COMELEC
    • M.R. Nos. 93-2654 (Nov. 3, 1993) and 94-0065 (Feb. 13, 1994): COMELEC imposed an administrative fine of ₱10,000.00 each for failure to file statement of contributions and expenditures.
    • M.R. No. 94-0594 (Feb. 24, 1994): COMELEC denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration and deemed the fines final.
    • En Banc, UND No. 94-040 (Apr. 28, 1994): COMELEC denied petitioner’s petition, prompting this Rule 65 certiorari to the Supreme Court.
  • Applicable statutory and regulatory provisions
    • Section 14, R.A. No. 7166: Requires every candidate and political party treasurer to file, within 30 days after election, full, true, and itemized statements of contributions and expenditures; prescribes fines of ₱1,000–₱30,000 for failure to file and higher fines plus perpetual disqualification for repeat offenses; prohibits entry into office without filing.
    • COMELEC Resolution No. 2348 (Jan. 13, 1992): Implements R.A. 7166 by requiring written reminders to candidates (Sec. 13) and reiterating mandatory filing with penalties (Sec. 17).

Issues:

  • Whether a person who withdraws his certificate of candidacy remains a “candidate” obligated to file a statement of contributions and expenditures under Section 14, R.A. No. 7166 and COMELEC Resolution No. 2348.
  • Whether failure to file the statement by a withdrawn candidate constitutes an administrative offense punishable by fine and prohibition from office.
  • Whether the COMELEC En Banc correctly imposed and affirmed the administrative fine on petitioner.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.