Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Rossano Samson Tiongco
Case
G.R. No. 262579
Decision Date
Feb 28, 2024
An 11-year-old girl was found dead with signs of sexual assault; her neighbor confessed to the crime, supported by circumstantial evidence, leading to his conviction for murder.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 262579)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Case Background
  • Accusation and Information
    • Rossano Samson y Tiongco was charged with Murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code for killing eleven-year-old Abegail Tobias y Dela Torre on October 8, 2014 in Norzagaray, Bulacan.
    • The Information alleged use of a crowbar, intent to kill, abuse of superior strength, and treachery.
  • Procedural History
    • Accused pleaded “Not Guilty” and underwent trial before RTC Branch 18, Malolos City (Crim. Case No. 4160-M-2014).
    • RTC found him guilty on July 20, 2020; imposed reclusion perpetua sans parole and awarded damages.
    • Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed on April 19, 2022 (CA-G.R. CR HC No. 14958).
    • Appeal to the Supreme Court ensued.
  • Prosecution’s Evidence
  • Eyewitness and Crime Scene Findings
    • Victim’s father, Jeremias Dela Torre, met accused at ~6:30 p.m., later found blood in the house and discovered Abegail’s lifeless body across the road.
    • Victim’s blouse disarrayed and underwear displaced; Medico-Legal Report documented 32 injuries, three fatal to the head.
  • Police Investigation and Physical Evidence
    • SPO3 Dennis Diaz tied accused to a drinking spree; only accused left the group.
    • A plastic bead (earring pendant) was recovered at accused’s doorstep and identified by the victim’s father.
    • Crowbar used in the killing was later recovered in accused’s room.
    • Accused fled to his father’s house in Navotas and was found sleeping on the second floor.
  • Confession and Legal Assistance
    • While en route to the station, accused admitted killing Abegail with a crowbar.
    • Extrajudicial confession executed in writing at the station with Atty. Mario M. Villegas (PAO) present; accused repeatedly said “Nakukunsensya na ako,” and was informed of rights against self-incrimination.
  • Defense Version
  • Denial and Alibi
    • Accused claimed he only learned of the incident on October 9 or 10, 2014.
    • He went to Navotas for rice and money; police came three days later.
    • He denied signing any confession knowingly, asserting he could not read the document.
  • RTC Decision
  • July 20, 2020 Decision
    • Convicted accused of Murder with treachery and abuse of superior strength.
    • Sentence: reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole; civil indemnity ₱100,000.00; actual damages ₱50,570.00; moral damages ₱100,000.00; exemplary damages ₱100,000.00; 6% interest.
  • CA and Supreme Court Proceedings
  • CA Ruling
    • On April 19, 2022, CA denied appeal, affirmed RTC Decision in toto.
  • Supreme Court Appeal
    • SC dismissed appeal; affirmed conviction; clarified treachery absorbed abuse of superior strength; modified damages in conformity with People v. Jugueta.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in admitting the accused-appellant’s extrajudicial confession.
  • Whether the CA erred in affirming the conviction based on circumstantial evidence.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.