Title
Philippine Trust Co. vs. Rivera
Case
G.R. No. 19761
Decision Date
Jan 29, 1923
A 1918 corporation's insolvency led to a dispute over unpaid stock subscriptions, as a shareholder’s liability remained despite an invalid resolution reducing capital stock.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 33426)

Facts:

  • Parties and Cause of Action
    • The case was instituted by the Philippine Trust Company as assignee in insolvency of La Cooperativa Naval Filipina against Marciano Rivera to recover a balance of P22,500 unpaid on Rivera's subscription to the corporation’s capital stock.
    • The action was filed on November 21, 1921, before the Court of First Instance of Manila. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
  • Incorporation and Stock Subscription
    • La Cooperativa Naval Filipina was incorporated in 1918 under Philippine laws with a capital stock of P100,000 divided into 1,000 shares at P100 par value each.
    • Marciano Rivera was one of the incorporators and subscribed to 450 shares, amounting to P45,000 in capital stock. Other persons subscribed the remaining shares.
    • The articles of incorporation were registered with the Bureau of Commerce and Industry on October 30, 1918.
  • Insolvency and Stock Subscription Payment Issue
    • The corporation eventually became insolvent and the Philippine Trust Company was appointed as its assignee in insolvency.
    • The plaintiff sought recovery of one-half of Rivera’s stock subscription, which was unpaid.
    • Rivera contended that a stockholders' meeting passed a resolution reducing the capital stock by 50%, releasing shareholders from paying the remaining balance beyond 50% of their subscription, and that fully paid certificates were issued accordingly.
    • There was no evidence that formal statutory requirements—including filing a certificate of reduction with the Bureau of Commerce and Industry as required under Section 17 of the Corporation Law (Act No. 1459)—were complied with to effectuate the reduction.

Issues:

  • Whether the resolution passed by the stockholders to reduce the capital stock by 50% and release the shareholders from paying the unpaid balance of their subscription is valid and binding against creditors.
  • Whether the defendant remains liable to pay the unpaid portion of his stock subscription despite the claimed capital reduction.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.