Case Digest (G.R. No. 117240)
Facts:
Philippine National Construction Corporation v. National Labor Relations Commission, G.R. No. 117240, October 02, 1997, Supreme Court Third Division, Romero, J., writing for the Court. Petitioner is Philippine National Construction Corporation (PNCC); respondents are the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and the PNCC Toll Operations Employees and Workers Union (PNCC‑TOEWU) (the individual complainants are members of the union).PNCC and PNCC‑TOEWU entered into a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) effective February 1, 1990 to January 30, 1995, which provided in Section 2 for a mid‑year bonus of one month’s basic salary to employees covered by the bargaining unit as of June 1 each year. In 1991 PNCC, citing financial difficulties, implemented a Voluntary Separation Program between April and May 1991. Several employees accepted the program, executed individual quitclaims/releases, and received separation payments computed as one‑and‑a‑half months’ pay for every year of credited service plus a 30‑day advance salary. Because PNCC no longer considered them employees as of June 1, 1991, it did not pay them the mid‑year bonus.
The resigned employees filed claims for non‑payment of the 1991 mid‑year bonus with the Labor Arbiter. In a decision dated March 29, 1993, Labor Arbiter Cornelio Linsangan ruled for the complainants and ordered PNCC to pay the bonuses and attorneys’ fees (total award P239,884.00 plus 10% attorneys’ fees). PNCC appealed to the NLRC, which affirmed the Labor Arbiter’s decision in a decision dated August 31, 199...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Are the resigned employees entitled to the 1991 mid‑year bonus under the CBA despite having voluntarily separated and executed quitclaims before June 1,...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)