Title
Philippine National Bank vs. Independent Planters Association
Case
G.R. No. L-28046
Decision Date
May 16, 1983
PNB sued solidary debtors; one died mid-case. Trial court dismissed, citing estate claim rules. SC ruled death doesn’t bar action vs. surviving debtors under Art. 1216, remanding for continuation.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-28046)

Facts:

Philippine National Bank, plaintiff-appellant, filed a complaint for collection of a sum of money on contract against Independent Planters Association, Inc. and the following defendants-appellees: Antonio Dimayuga, Delfin Fajardo, Ceferino Valencia, Moises Carandang, Luciano Castillo, Aurelio Valencia, Lauro Leviste, Gavino Gonzales, Lope Gevana and Bonifacio Laureana in Civil Case No. 46741 before the Court of First Instance of Manila (Branch XX). The action rested on a solidary obligation and the plaintiff presented its evidence. During the pendency of the case one defendant, Ceferino Valencia, died after the plaintiff had presented its evidence. The court a quo dismissed the complaint on the ground that, under Section 6, Rule 86 of the Rules of Court, a money claim against a decedent whose obligation is solidary with others should be prosecuted in the testate or intestate proceedings for settlement of the estate. The bank appealed the dismissal to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

Whether, in an action for collection of a sum of money based on contract against all the solidary debtors, the death of one defendant deprives the court of jurisdiction to proceed with the case against the surviving defendants.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.