Title
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. vs. City of Davao
Case
G.R. No. L-23080
Decision Date
Oct 30, 1965
PLDT challenged Davao City's authority to establish a telephone system, claiming it infringed on its franchise rights. The Supreme Court ruled Davao City had authority under its charter, exempt from PSC certification, and PLDT's franchise was non-exclusive.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-23080)

Facts:

  • Parties and Proceedings
    • Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co., Inc. (PLDT) filed on May 23, 1964 a petition for prohibition and mandamus against the City of Davao and the Public Service Commission (PSC), with ITT Philippines, Inc. intervening by motion granted August 1964.
    • PLDT sought to enjoin the City of Davao from executing its contract with ITT Philippines for a city telephone system and to compel the PSC to require a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN).
  • Municipal Action and Contractual Arrangements
    • On August 7 and December 27, 1963, the Davao City Council passed Resolutions Nos. 664 and 2015, authorizing establishment of a city-owned telephone system.
    • On February 26, 1964, Davao City contracted with ITT Philippines, Inc. for installation of a system at P3,587,000, paid a P717,000 down payment on May 29, 1964, with delivery due November 29, 1966; construction thereafter advanced.
  • Regulatory and Charter Provisions
    • Davao City Charter (Commonwealth Act No. 51) Section 14(ee) empowers the council “to enact all ordinances…for…the comfort, convenience and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants.”
    • Public Service Act Sections 13–14(e) exempt government entities from CPCN requirements; PLDT’s franchise (Act 3436, Sec. 14) is expressly non-exclusive.
    • Subsequent enactment of Republic Act 4354 (June 19, 1965) Revised Charter of Davao City, Section 16(aa-1), specifically authorizes establishment and maintenance of a telephone system, subject to the Public Service Act.

Issues:

  • Whether, under its charter’s general welfare clause and prior to RA 4354, Davao City had authority to establish and operate a municipal telephone system.
  • Whether Davao City was required to secure a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the PSC for its proposed system.
  • Whether PLDT’s non-exclusive franchise rights were impaired by the city’s entry as a new telephone operator.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.