Title
Supreme Court
Philippine Heart Center vs. Local Government of Quezon City
Case
G.R. No. 225409
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2020
PHC, a government instrumentality and charitable institution, was exempt from real property taxes; Quezon City's tax assessments, levy, and auction of its properties were declared void by the Supreme Court.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 225409)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Dispositions Assailed
    • The Court of Appeals, in CA-G.R. SP No. 121019, issued:
      • Decision (March 15, 2016) dismissing Philippine Heart Center’s (PHC) petition for certiorari as the wrong remedy against assessment, levy, and sale of its properties.
      • Resolution (June 23, 2016) denying PHC’s motion for reconsideration.
    • PHC’s petition before the Supreme Court seeks to annul these rulings.
  • Antecedents
    • Establishment and Charters
      • PD 673 (1975) created the PHC as a specialty hospital with a ten-year tax exemption; LOI 1455 (1985) extended the exemption “without interruption.”
      • PD 673 authorized PHC to acquire, hold, encumber, lease, sell or dispose of properties and endowed it with corporate powers.
    • Properties and Tax Notices
      • PHC owned eleven parcels in Quezon City under various tax declarations.
      • In 2004, QC issued Final Notices of Delinquency for ₱36,530,545 real property taxes; properties were levied.
    • Agreements and Withholding of Payments
      • MOA 2006: PHC to render free medical services in lieu of tax payment; suspended after OGCC memorandum (Aug 22, 2006) citing MIAA decision.
      • MOA 2010: similar terms; implementation suspended by new PHC director.
    • Levy and Sale (2011)
      • QC issued new Notices of Delinquency (June 1, 2011) and Warrant of Levy (June 13, 2011).
      • Public auction (July 7, 2011): QC Government was lone bidder and purchased the properties.
    • CA Proceedings
      • PHC filed certiorari petition (Sept 1, 2011) alleging grave abuse of discretion and tax exemption under PD 673, LOI 1455, Constitution, RA 7160, and prior jurisprudence (MIAA, MCIAA).
      • Respondents moved to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, lack of jurisdiction, improper verification, non-payment of deposit under RA 7160 §267, and insufficient proof of exemption.
      • CA initially dismissed for non-exhaustion (Sept 25, 2012), reinstated petition on exceptions (Mar 18, 2013), then dismissed again as wrong remedy (Mar 15, 2016).

Issues:

  • Whether PHC substantially complied with verification and certification against forum shopping.
  • Whether certiorari is the proper remedy to challenge respondents’ assessment, levy, and sale.
  • Whether PHC and its Quezon City properties are exempt from real property taxes and whether the levy and sale are void.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.