Title
Supreme Court
Philippine Diamond Hotel and Resort, Inc. vs. Manila Diamond Hotel Employees Union
Case
G.R. No. 158075
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2006
A union staged an illegal strike after failing to secure certification as the exclusive bargaining agent; officers lost employment status, while non-participating members were reinstated without backwages.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 158075)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Union Registration and Certification Election
    • Manila Diamond Hotel Employees Union (the union) registered with DOLE on August 19, 1996.
    • On November 11, 1996, it filed a Petition for Certification Election with DOLE-NCR, which was denied for non-compliance with Section 2, Rule V, Book V and for fragmenting the workforce.
  • Cash Discrepancy Incident
    • On June 2, 1997, cashier Francis Mendoza failed to remit ₱71,692.50.
    • Mendoza implicated union president Jose Leonardo B. Kimpo, who claimed ignorance; Mendoza was suspended one week, and Kimpo was reassigned to Cost Control on July 14, 1997.
  • Collective Bargaining and Strike Notices
    • Through Kimpo, the union served a Notice to Bargain; hotel refused recognition absent certification.
    • On September 18, 1997, union called a strike vote; filed Notice of Strike on September 29, 1997 with NCMB, alleging unfair labor practices (ULP) including refusal to bargain and harassment.
    • NCMB conciliation conferences held October 6, 13, and 20, 1997; union insisted on a CBA for its members.
  • Strike and Related Proceedings
    • On November 20, 1997, parties agreed to a consent election under proper procedure; union scheduled next conciliation for December 1.
    • On November 29, 1997, union struck; National Union of Workers in the Hotel, Restaurant and Allied Industries (NUWHRAIN) and some supervisors joined.
    • On December 1, 1997, hotel filed an injunction with NLRC; three supervisors fired and they filed illegal dismissal complaints.
    • NLRC ocular inspection (December 4) confirmed strikers’ blockade of hotel ingress/egress; NLRC issued a TRO (December 8) ordering cessation of obstruction; tent removed December 10, resulting in stone projectiles and injuries.
  • Administrative and Judicial Orders
    • On April 15, 1998, DOLE Secretary Trajano certified the dispute to NLRC for compulsory arbitration and directed return to work.
    • On April 30, 1998, Acting Secretary Españo­l modified the order to reinstate strikers to payroll only and consolidated related cases.
    • NLRC Resolution (November 19, 1999) declared the strike illegal, union officers and members lost employment status, and dismissed related complaints.
    • Court of Appeals (November 21, 2002) affirmed NLRC’s findings of illegality and loss of status for officers, but ordered reinstatement and backwages for union members.
    • Hotel appealed to the Supreme Court seeking reversal of reinstatement and backwages.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in ordering reinstatement and backwages for union members declared to have lost their employment status.
  • Whether such order deviated from established jurisprudence on illegal strikes, loss of employment status, and backwages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.