Title
Peralta-Diasen vs. Paguinto
Case
A.C. No. 8367
Decision Date
Aug 1, 2023
Complainant filed disbarment against lawyer for gross negligence, failure to prosecute, non-communication, and deceit; Court disbarred lawyer with fine for repeated misconduct and disregard of client trust.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 199480)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Engagement of Legal Services and Payment of Fees
    • In 2002, Estrella Peralta-Diasen (complainant) engaged Atty. Oscar P. Paguinto (respondent) to file and prosecute cases against Nueva Villa Realty & Development Corporation for selling subdivision lots previously sold to others.
    • The cases were docketed as Civil Case Nos. TG-2471 and TG-2472 before Branch 18, Regional Trial Court of Tagaytay City.
    • Complainant paid P25,000.00 in acceptance fees and more than P81,000.00 in legal fees from November 2002 to December 2008.
  • Lack of Case Progress and Discovery of Dismissal
    • In April 2008, complainant inquired about case status but received only vague assurances from respondent.
    • In June 2009, complainant's representative discovered that both cases were dismissed (TG-2471 in 2005 and TG-2472 in 2007) for failure to prosecute.
  • Filing of Administrative Complaint and Respondent's Non-Compliance
    • Complainant filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Paguinto for abandoning cases and violating trust.
    • Despite extensions granted, respondent failed to file a comment or respond to the complaint.
    • A fine of P1,000.00 was imposed but respondent still did not file any pleading.
  • Investigation and Recommendations
    • The Court referred the case to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for investigation.
    • Commissioner Gilbert L. Macatangay found respondent administratively liable for gross negligence and recommended two-year suspension.
    • On July 11, 2020, the IBP Board of Governors modified the penalty to four-year suspension and a P15,000.00 fine for failure to file an answer and other procedural lapses.
  • Supreme Court Review and Prior Cases
    • The Court noted respondent's gross and inexcusable negligence resulting in the dismissal of cases due to failure to prosecute.
    • Atty. Paguinto failed to inform complainant of case developments and continued to receive legal fees after case dismissal.
    • Respondent has prior disciplinary violations including suspension in 2004 for misleading a client and in 2010 for multiple infractions involving conspiracy, filing baseless complaints, and non-compliance with court orders.
  • Final Findings and Penalties
    • Respondent's repeated misconduct showed no reformation, constituting an aggravating circumstance.
    • The Court found respondent guilty of gross negligence and willful disobedience of court orders.
    • Penalties imposed include disbarment, striking off respondent’s name from the Roll of Attorneys, and a fine of P100,000.00.

Issues:

  • Whether or not Atty. Oscar P. Paguinto committed gross negligence in the performance of his duties as a lawyer resulting in the dismissal of cases for failure to prosecute.
  • Whether or not Atty. Paguinto violated his duty to inform and apprise his client of material developments in the case.
  • Whether or not respondent willfully and deliberately disobeyed the Court's order by failing to file his comment or responsive pleading.
  • What is the appropriate disciplinary action to be imposed upon Atty. Paguinto given his repeated infractions and misconduct.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.