Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Benny Dalaguet
Case
G.R. No. 249414
Decision Date
Jul 27, 2022
Benny Dalaguet convicted of two counts of lascivious conduct against a minor, affirmed by Supreme Court despite his denial; credible testimony and evidence upheld.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 249414)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Charges and Proceedings
    • Two informations (March 29, 2010) charged Benny Dalaguet with violations of Section 5(b), R.A. No. 7610, for two separate incidents of alleged sexual acts against AAA, a 15-year-old neighbor, in December 2009 and March 2010.
    • Pre-trial stipulations confirmed (a) identities and victim’s age; (b) neighbor relationship; and (c) that Dalaguet entered AAA’s house on March 9, 2010.
  • Evidence Presented
    • AAA testified to two incidents: in a field leading to a nipa hut (Dec 2009) and at home (Mar 9, 2010), describing being carried or led, undressed, held tightly, shouted for help, threatened if she spoke, and “sexual intercourse” without penile penetration.
    • Corroborative evidence: EEE (grandfather) witnessed the second incident; Dr. Andaya’s certificate noted healed genital lacerations; social worker Rubio conducted a family study.
    • Defense: Dalaguet denied the offenses, claimed he merely retrieved his cellphone, and alleged unlawful arrest and lack of knowledge of the December incident.
  • Lower Court Decisions
    • RTC (July 13, 2016) convicted Dalaguet of two counts of rape (RA 7610 construed under RPC Articles 335–336), imposing reclusion perpetua and damages totaling P200,000.
    • CA (June 25, 2019) modified the conviction to two counts of lascivious conduct (Sec 5(b), RA 7610), sentencing prision mayor (medium) to reclusion temporal and awarding P50,000 each for civil indemnity, moral and exemplary damages per count.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in convicting Dalaguet of lascivious conduct under Section 5(b), RA 7610 despite the prosecution’s failure to prove rape through sexual intercourse beyond reasonable doubt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.