Title
People vs. ZZZ
Case
G.R. No. 229209
Decision Date
Feb 12, 2020
ZZZ, accused of raping his 15-year-old granddaughter AAA, was convicted based on her credible testimony, corroborated by witnesses and medical evidence. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, rejecting ZZZ's impotence defense and awarding damages.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 229209)

Facts:

  • Charge and Arraignment
    • Accused ZZZ, grandfather of victim AAA, was charged with rape under Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code for carnal knowledge of his 15-year-old granddaughter in December 2010 at Sitio Anahaw, Brgy. Otod, San Fernando, Romblon.
    • ZZZ pleaded not guilty and trial ensued.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • AAA’s testimony described repeated rape incidents by her grandfather in December 2010, her escape to the forest after the act, and a subsequent attack with a bolo when she tried to return home.
    • Barangay Captain Manuel Lotec testified that on January 9, 2011 he received a report that AAA “was being chased and raped” and observed her as “pale and trembling.”
    • Social worker Rosa Ravalo assisted AAA in executing her affidavit, translated her statement from Tagalog to Visayan, and accompanied her to the medical examination.
    • Dr. Lolinie Montojo issued a medico-legal certificate noting old, healed lacerations of AAA’s hymen.
  • Defense Evidence
    • ZZZ testified in denial and claimed that his advanced age rendered him impotent and incapable of erection.
  • Lower Court Decisions
    • The RTC of Romblon found AAA’s testimony credible, sufficiently corroborated by the medico-legal certificate and supporting witnesses, convicted ZZZ of rape, imposed reclusion perpetua, and awarded ₱75,000 civil indemnity and ₱50,000 moral damages.
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, reduced civil indemnity to ₱50,000, awarded ₱30,000 exemplary damages, and retained other penalties.
  • Supreme Court Proceedings
    • ZZZ filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari questioning the sufficiency of evidence and witness credibility.
    • The Supreme Court ordered supplemental briefs and took up the sole issue of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues:

  • Main Issue
    • Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that ZZZ committed rape under Article 266-A, RPC.
  • Subsidiary Issues
    • Whether AAA’s testimony was credible and sufficiently corroborated.
    • Whether ZZZ’s impotence defense negated the element of carnal knowledge.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.