Title
People vs. Vengco y David
Case
G.R. No. L-31657
Decision Date
Jan 31, 1984
In 1967 Manila, Charlie Celadena was fatally stabbed by a group, including Constantino Leneses and Leon David. Witnesses identified the attackers, and the Supreme Court upheld their murder conviction, citing credible testimonies, conspiracy, and rejecting alibi defenses.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-31657)

Facts:

  • Overview of the Case
    • The case involves the murder of Charlie Celadena y Lim, which occurred on or about August 24, 1967, in Manila, Philippines.
    • The accused include Constantino Leneses (alias "Alex Remonte") and Leon David (alias "Junior"), along with other accomplices.
    • The charge was for murder committed with abuse of superior strength, where the accused were alleged to have attacked the victim with premeditation and treachery using bladed and pointed instruments.
  • Details of the Incident
    • The prosecution’s narrative describes that at night in a well-lit area in Bagac Street, Tondo, Manila, the group of accused attacked and assaulted Charlie Celadena.
      • The assailants were armed with a dagger, an ice pick, and another pointed weapon.
      • The attack involved stabbing and hitting the victim on various parts of the body, resulting in eleven stab wounds—five of which were fatal.
    • The crime was committed with evident premeditation as the assailants, acting in concert, attacked the victim and then fled the scene, leaving him gravely injured.
  • Testimonies and Evidence Presented by the Prosecution
    • Witness Testimonies:
      • Go Hong
        • Testified that he was at his residence in Tondo when he heard a commotion.
ii. Witnessed Charlie Celadena being stabbed by Edwin Vengco while noting that one of the men fleeing was recognized as Constantino Leneses. iii. Assisted the victim by removing him from the ground and later observed the victim’s condition of being covered in blood.
  • Rolando Quiane
    • Recanted an encounter along Bagac Street where he and his brother were conversing, witnessing a taxi disembark Charlie Celadena.
ii. Observed a group of five persons, including Edwin Vengco and Leon David, approaching the victim. iii. Noted the subsequent commotion and later saw evidence of the victim bleeding after being left alone.
  • Purita Delgado
    • While in a house on Bagac Street, she saw through a window the victim leaning on a wall.
ii. Observed that the victim was being restrained by two men, one of whom was identified as Leon David. iii. Witnessed additional persons approaching and delivering fatal stab wounds to the victim.
  • Dr. Mariano de Lara
    • As the Chief of the Medico-Legal Division, he performed the autopsy.
ii. His findings confirmed that the victim sustained eleven stab wounds, distributed mainly on the chest and abdomen.
  • Additional Corroborative Evidence:
    • A taxi driver, Melquiades Nuque, testified that from a distance he observed the assault but did not see Leon David participating directly with the others.
    • The sequence of events and the immediate aftermath, including the fleeing and concealment of some of the accused, added circumstantial weight to the prosecution’s case.
  • Defenses Presented by the Accused
    • Constantino Leneses’ Defense:
      • Denied involvement in the stabbing but acknowledged presence at a drinking spree.
      • Claimed an alibi stating that he was at a tailor shop earlier in the day waiting for a pair of pants.
      • Asserted that he only became involved later when invited to a gathering at Leon David’s house, where he became too intoxicated to recall the events of the night.
    • Leon David’s Defense:
      • Denied any participation in the actual killing.
      • Claimed that he was present only briefly and that the actual stabbing was carried out by Edwin Vengco, alongside Roger and Romeo.
      • Alleged that when he encountered the incident, he shouted against the violence and subsequently left, motivated by fear of being implicated.
      • Attempted to cast doubt on the testimony of Purita Delgado, though he could not provide a satisfactory reason for her alleged bias.
  • Judicial Findings in the Lower Court
    • The trial court found both Constantino Leneses and Leon David guilty of murder.
    • The conviction was based on:
      • The consistency and corroborative nature of the eyewitness testimonies.
      • The demonstrable participation and coordinated conduct of the alleged conspirators.
    • The accused were sentenced to reclusion perpetua, alongside accessory penalties including payment of indemnity to the heirs of the deceased.
    • Specific emphasis was placed on the crime being committed with abuse of superior strength and a proximate cause-effect relationship between the assault and the victim’s death.

Issues:

  • Credibility and Sufficiency of the Prosecution’s Evidence
    • Whether the testimonies of witnesses (Go Hong, Rolando Quiane, and Purita Delgado) are credible and supported by corroborative evidence.
    • If the identification of Constantino Leneses as one of the assailants is beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Evaluation of the Alibi and Denial Raised by the Accused
    • The credibility of Constantino Leneses’ alibi asserting that he was at a tailor shop and later incapacitated by intoxication.
    • Leon David’s claim of non-participation and his explanation for leaving the scene, including the alleged fear of Edwin Vengco.
    • Whether the defenses are substantiated by positive, clear, and convincing evidence.
  • Conspiracy and Joint Participation
    • Whether the actions of the accused and their companions establish a conspiracy to commit murder.
    • The implication of cooperative engagement even in the absence of an overt meeting, inferred from the coordinated violence during the assault.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.