Title
People vs. Velasquez
Case
G.R. No. L-35241
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1983
In the case of People v. Velasquez, the Supreme Court acquits the defendant-appellant of the charge of rape due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, highlighting doubts about the credibility and paternity of the child involved.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-35241)

Facts:

  • Case: People vs. Velasquez, G.R. No. L-35241, decided on February 28, 1983.
  • Appellant: Servillano Velasquez, accused of rape.
  • Location: Licab, Nueva Ecija.
  • Complainant: Remedios Domingo, a housemaid for Velasquez's sister, Cecilia Velasquez.
  • Incident Date: February 9, 1966; Remedios alleged that Velasquez entered her room, threatened her with a bladed weapon, and coerced her into sexual intercourse.
  • Allegations included two subsequent assaults.
  • Remedios became pregnant and gave birth on December 22, 1966.
  • Initial complaint filed for "seduction or rape"; formal information for rape filed on October 20, 1967.
  • The trial court convicted Velasquez of qualified seduction and imposed an indeterminate penalty.
  • The Solicitor General appealed, arguing for a conviction of rape, leading to Supreme Court review.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed and set aside the lower court's decision.
  • Servillano Velasquez was acquitted of both rape and qualified seduction due to insuf...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court found that the trial court erred in convicting Velasquez of qualified seduction, as the information lacked essential elements such as the complainant's virginity and age.
  • Convictions must be based on the allegations in the information; discrepancies cannot justify a conviction.
  • The complainant's testimony lacked corroboration and was inconsistent.
  • The absence of physical injuries, lack of immediate outcry, and failure to report ra...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.