Case Digest (G.R. No. 121519)
Facts:
People of the Philippines v. Vicente Ty and Carmen Ty, G.R. No. 121519, October 30, 1996, First Division, Kapunan, J., writing for the Court. The accused-appellants were owners and operators of Sir John Clinic in Kalookan City and were charged in an information filed by the 2nd Assistant City Prosecutor of Kalookan with kidnapping and failure to return a minor under Article 270 of the Revised Penal Code.On November 18, 1987 complainant Johanna Sombong brought her seven-month-old daughter Arabella to the clinic for treatment. After initial confinement and subsequent nursery care, Arabella remained in the clinic’s custody when the mother did not return and later could not pay accumulated hospital bills. A yaya was hired and the child was later moved to the staff residence. Over time the mother made no effective attempt to reclaim the child and the clinic notified the barangay captain; clinic staff took turns caring for the infant.
In 1988–1989, on the recommendation of a staff member the clinic entrusted the child to Lilibeth Neri (and ultimately to her aunt, Marietta Neri Alviar). In 1992 the complainant reappeared and sought custody. She filed a habeas corpus petition in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City which was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; she later filed another habeas corpus petition against the guardians and the RTC granted it, but the Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that the child produced (Cristina Grace Neri) was not proven to be the complainant’s daughter, Arabella. This Court in Sombong v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 111876, January 31, 1996, affirmed the Court of Appeals, concluding Cristina was not shown to be Arabella.
Meanwhile the Kalookan RTC, Branch 123, after trial convicted the Tys on May 31, 1995 of kidnapping and failure to return a minor under Articl...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the trial court err in convicting the accused-appellants of kidnapping and failure to return a minor under Article 270 of the Revised Penal Code?
- If the crime committed was not under Article 270, should the accused have been convicted under Article 227 instead?
- Did the trial court err in failing to recommend executive clemency pursuant to People v. Gutierrez?
- Was the trial court’s award of ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)