Title
People vs. Tanedo
Case
G.R. No. 110405
Decision Date
Jan 2, 1997
Three individuals are convicted of murder, with the court affirming that treachery is a qualifying circumstance in the crime.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 110405)

Facts:

  • On April 25, 1982, at around 6:00 PM, brothers Domingo and Dominador Nepal were near Merly Pelago's store in Barangay San Isidro, General Luna, Quezon.
  • Present at the store were Barangay Captain Pacito Agoncillo, Ruben Agoncillo, and others engaged in drinking.
  • Dominador went to a nearby house while Domingo was called over by Ruben.
  • Dominador heard shouts and returned to find Jesus Lachica kicking Ruben, with Domingo trying to intervene.
  • After deciding to leave, Domingo and Dominador were ambushed by Virgilio TaAedo, Berlito Lachica, Danilo Mercadal, and others armed with bladed weapons.
  • Domingo was attacked, suffering multiple wounds, including a fatal chest injury.
  • Maxima Remuyan, Domingo's mother, witnessed the attack and called for help, but it was too late.
  • The accused were charged with murder, facing allegations of conspiracy, treachery, and evident premeditation.
  • During the trial, the accused presented alibis and denied involvement, while prosecution witnesses testified against them.
  • On December 14, 1990, the trial court convicted the accused of murder, sentencing them to imprisonment and ordering indemnification for Domingo's heirs.
  • The accused appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to reclusion perpetua.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the trial court did not misappreciate the testimonies of the witnesses.
  • The evidence presented was sufficient to establish the culpability of the accused for murder.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the trial court's findings of fact, especially regarding witness credibility, are given significant weight due to its opportunity to observe witness demeanor.
  • The defense's alibi was found to be weak and insufficient to prove the accused's absence at the crime scene.
  • Testimonies from prosecution witnesses, including ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.