Title
People vs. Talisic y Villamor
Case
G.R. No. 97961
Decision Date
Sep 5, 1997
Jimmy Talisic killed his wife, claiming adultery, but failed to prove it. The Supreme Court found his testimony implausible, convicting him of parricide and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 97961)

Facts:

  • Statement of the Case
    • On May 13, 1988, Second Assistant City Fiscal Norma B. Siao filed an Information in RTC Iligan City, Branch 5, charging Jimmy Talisic y Villamor with parricide under Article 246 of the Revised Penal Code for stabbing his wife, Janita Sapio Talisic, on or about May 8, 1988.
    • At arraignment on October 26, 1988, the accused pleaded not guilty.
    • After trial, the RTC rendered judgment finding the accused guilty of parricide, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and ordering indemnity of ₱50,000 to the heirs of the victim.
  • Prosecution’s Version
    • Testimony of Danilo Talisic (son): At dawn of May 8, 1988, he found his mother stabbed to death with a bloodied chisel, displayed by his father at their home altar. He fetched his sister and informed their aunt and grandfather.
    • Testimony of Victoria Sapyo Tautho (aunt): Arrived around 6:00 AM; saw the victim’s lifeless body on the living room floor and the bloodstained chisel at the altar.
    • Testimony of Dr. Regino Gaite (forensic pathologist): Necropsy revealed sixteen stab wounds—some four inches deep, including fatal wounds to the heart and carotid region—causing hemorrhage and shock.
  • Defense’s Version
    • Accused’s testimony: Between 3:00 and 4:00 AM he fetched water from a well 200 m away; upon return, he allegedly surprised a man lying on his wife, drew his bolo, missed, and chased the man who escaped.
    • He claimed his wife then attacked him with a chisel; he parried, grabbed the chisel, lost his temper, and stabbed her to death.
    • His account was rife with inconsistencies—unable to identify the intruder, conflicting descriptions of the intruder’s clothing and its position, and implausible timing for putting on pants while being attacked.

Issues:

  • Whether the accused-appellant established the exceptional circumstance under Article 247 of the Revised Penal Code—surprising a spouse in the act of sexual intercourse with another and killing in the act or immediately thereafter—thus qualifying for the penalty of destierro instead of parricide.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.