Title
People vs. Talingdan
Case
G.R. No. L-32126
Decision Date
Jul 6, 1978
Bernardo Bagabag was murdered in his home by Nemesio Talingdan, Magellan Tobias, Augusto Berras, and Pedro Bides, with Teresa Domogma aiding as an accessory. The court upheld Corazon’s credible testimony, rejected alibis, and found treachery, premeditation, and dwelling violation as aggravating factors.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-40098)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background and Relationships
    • Victim Bernardo Bagabag lived with wife Teresa Domogma and their children in Sobosob, Sallapadan, Abra.
    • Relationship between Bernardo and Teresa was strained; Teresa deserted home multiple times.
    • Accused Nemesio Talingdan (a local policeman) allegedly had an illicit affair with Teresa; the couple’s daughter Corazon witnessed compromising meetings.
  • Events Leading to Murder
    • About a month before June 24, 1967, Teresa stayed away over three weeks with Talingdan in Tayum.
    • On June 22, a violent quarrel: Bernardo slapped Teresa; she summoned police; Talingdan came armed and threatened Bernardo’s life.
    • Morning of June 23, Corazon saw Teresa meet with Talingdan, Magellan Tobias, Augusto Berras, and Pedro Bides in a hut and overheard talk of “killing” Bernardo.
  • The Killing on June 24, 1967
    • At dusk, Corazon prepared supper in the kitchen. She saw Teresa descend to meet the four men, armed with long guns, conversing 3–4 m below her.
    • Corazon warned Bernardo; he ignored her and sat near the door. From below the stairs (“batalan”), shots rang out.
    • The four assailants climbed up; Talingdan and Tobias fired further shots. Bides threatened Corazon to silence her; the group fled east.
    • Corazon’s teacher and later police arrived; Teresa threatened Corazon to keep silent. Autopsy was done ~36 hours postmortem; Bernardo was buried June 26.
  • Investigation and Trial Evidence
    • Prosecution relied on Corazon’s sworn statement (Exh. B) identifying the four male appellants as killers and implicating Teresa in threats.
    • Teresa and male co-appellants offered alibis: Talingdan claimed attendance at a cursillo in Bangued (June 22–26); Tobias, Berras, and Bides said they were sleeping at Mrs. Bayongan’s house 250 m away.
    • Defense challenged Corazon’s credibility, pointing to inconsistencies in time statements and alleged coaching by relatives.

Issues:

  • Guilt of the four male appellants (Talingdan, Tobias, Berras, Bides) for murder qualified by treachery, with premeditation, in the victim’s dwelling.
  • Criminal liability of Teresa Domogma: whether as co-conspirator/principal or only accessory after the fact.
  • Credibility and sufficiency of the minor witness Corazon’s testimony despite alleged discrepancies.
  • Validity of alibi defenses and weight of physical evidence (bullet holes, empty shells).

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.