Title
People vs. San Jose y Suico
Case
G.R. No. 179148
Decision Date
Jul 23, 2018
The Supreme Court acquits the accused due to the prosecution's failure to prove the chain of custody and the integrity of the evidence.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 179148)

Facts:

  • Alexis Dindo San Jose y Suico, known as "Dodong Diamond," faced multiple charges related to illegal drug activities and firearm possession.
  • The incidents occurred on January 26, 2000, in San Juan, Metro Manila.
  • The prosecution claimed San Jose sold and possessed methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu) and illegally possessed firearms without permits.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Pasig City, Branch 156, found him guilty on April 13, 2005, under the Dangerous Drugs Act (Republic Act No. 6425) and Presidential Decree No. 1866.
  • San Jose received a life sentence and fines for drug-related offenses, along with prison terms and fines for illegal firearm possession.
  • The prosecution's case relied on police testimony from a buy-bust operation, where a police poseur-buyer purchased shabu from San Jose.
  • The defense argued that San Jose was framed and was only at the condominium to sell a car to Mr. Ong, who was not charged despite being present during the operation.
  • The RTC's decision was appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which upheld the RTC's ruling on April 27, 2007.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court acquitted Alexis Dindo San Jose y Suico of all charges.
  • The Court determined that the prosecution did not prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt for the Dangerous Drugs Act violations...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted the necessity for the prosecution to prove the corpus delicti in drug-related cases, which includes a clear chain of custody for seized substances.
  • Significant lapses were noted in evidence handling, particularly that the drugs were marked only at the police office, not at ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.