Title
People vs. Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso @ "Bong Pango"
Case
G.R. No. 186392
Decision Date
Jan 18, 2012
A drug peddler was convicted for selling and possessing illegal drugs. The court affirmed the trial court's decision, imposing life imprisonment and fines under RA 9165.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 206451)

Facts:

  • The Case Background
    • On September 22, 2006, Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso, alias Bong Pango, was charged under two cases for violation of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002):
      • Criminal Case No. 06-1837: Sale of Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) with specific allegation that he willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously sold 0.02 gram of shabu for Php300.00.
      • Criminal Case No. 06-1838: Possession of Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) weighing 0.02 gram without lawful authority.
  • The Buy-Bust Operation
    • On September 21, 2006, PO3 Eusebio Lowaton Jr. and Makati Anti-Drug Abuse Council (MADAC) operatives conducted a buy-bust operation at Dapitan Street, Barangay Guadalupe Nuevo, Makati City, against the accused.
    • An informant reported that "Bong" was selling shabu and personally bought from him.
    • The police verified that the suspect "Bong" had prior drug-related records and coordinated with the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), which issued a Certificate of Coordination for the operation targeting "Narciso Sabadlab."
    • The buy-bust team, including police officers and MADAC members, used marked Php100 bills.
    • At the operation, the informant identified the accused as the subject, introduced him to PO3 Lowaton, who posed as the buyer.
    • The accused, carrying his son, agreed to sell Php300.00 worth of shabu; he handed over a plastic sachet containing the drug and was paid with the marked bills.
    • After the transaction, PO3 Lowaton revealed his identity, arrested the accused, read his rights, and ordered a body search.
    • The body search recovered marked money and another plastic sachet; both sachets were labeled, submitted to the crime lab, and tested positive for methylamphetamine hydrochloride.
  • Testimonies and Defense
    • PO3 Lowaton and MADAC Castillo corroborated the detailed events of the operation, including the marked money and recovery of the drugs.
    • The accused denied charges and claimed illegal arrest in front of his home, alleged he was forcibly taken without explanation, forced to give a urine sample, and pointed to prior unrelated arrest involving payment to PO3 Lowaton.
    • Accused also argued discrepancies regarding the name on the coordination documents ("Narciso Sabadlab" vs. "Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso") and questioned the lack of prior surveillance.
    • The accused contended it was unlikely he would commit drug sales while carrying his son.
  • Trial Court Decision
    • The RTC found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt for violations of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of R.A. 9165.
    • Sentences imposed:
      • Life imprisonment and a fine of Php500,000 for illegal sale (Criminal Case No. 06-1837).
      • Imprisonment of 12 years and 1 day to 14 years and 8 months and a fine of Php300,000 for illegal possession (Criminal Case No. 06-1838).
  • Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Review
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC Decision on July 31, 2008.
    • The accused appealed to the Supreme Court, asserting errors related to credibility of prosecution witnesses and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues:

  • Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the accused-appellant's guilt for violations of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
  • Whether there were any irregularities or illegality in the buy-bust operation, such as improper coordination with the PDEA or mistaken identity concerning the accused and "Narciso Sabadlab."
  • Whether the penalties imposed were proper under the law.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.