Case Digest (G.R. No. 206451)
Facts:
Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso, also known as "Bong Pango," was charged with violations of Sections 5 and 11 of Republic Act No. 9165, the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, on or about September 21, 2006, in Makati City. He was accused of unlawfully selling and possessing methylamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu), weighing 0.02 grams. The charges resulted from a buy-bust operation conducted by the Makati Central Police Station's Special Operation Task Force (SAID-SOTF), coordinated with the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA). Police Officer 3 Eusebio Lowaton Jr. acted as the poseur-buyer. According to testimonies, an informant had previously bought from the accused, and the team executed the operation after receiving information implicating "Narciso Sabadlab." During the operation, Marcos Sabadlab, carrying his child, sold sachets of shabu to PO3 Lowaton for Php300.00, which was paid in marked bills. Upon arrest and body search, another sachet and the marked money wereCase Digest (G.R. No. 206451)
Facts:
- The Case Background
- On September 22, 2006, Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso, alias Bong Pango, was charged under two cases for violation of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002):
- Criminal Case No. 06-1837: Sale of Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) with specific allegation that he willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously sold 0.02 gram of shabu for Php300.00.
- Criminal Case No. 06-1838: Possession of Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu) weighing 0.02 gram without lawful authority.
- The Buy-Bust Operation
- On September 21, 2006, PO3 Eusebio Lowaton Jr. and Makati Anti-Drug Abuse Council (MADAC) operatives conducted a buy-bust operation at Dapitan Street, Barangay Guadalupe Nuevo, Makati City, against the accused.
- An informant reported that "Bong" was selling shabu and personally bought from him.
- The police verified that the suspect "Bong" had prior drug-related records and coordinated with the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA), which issued a Certificate of Coordination for the operation targeting "Narciso Sabadlab."
- The buy-bust team, including police officers and MADAC members, used marked Php100 bills.
- At the operation, the informant identified the accused as the subject, introduced him to PO3 Lowaton, who posed as the buyer.
- The accused, carrying his son, agreed to sell Php300.00 worth of shabu; he handed over a plastic sachet containing the drug and was paid with the marked bills.
- After the transaction, PO3 Lowaton revealed his identity, arrested the accused, read his rights, and ordered a body search.
- The body search recovered marked money and another plastic sachet; both sachets were labeled, submitted to the crime lab, and tested positive for methylamphetamine hydrochloride.
- Testimonies and Defense
- PO3 Lowaton and MADAC Castillo corroborated the detailed events of the operation, including the marked money and recovery of the drugs.
- The accused denied charges and claimed illegal arrest in front of his home, alleged he was forcibly taken without explanation, forced to give a urine sample, and pointed to prior unrelated arrest involving payment to PO3 Lowaton.
- Accused also argued discrepancies regarding the name on the coordination documents ("Narciso Sabadlab" vs. "Marcos Sabadlab y Narciso") and questioned the lack of prior surveillance.
- The accused contended it was unlikely he would commit drug sales while carrying his son.
- Trial Court Decision
- The RTC found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt for violations of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of R.A. 9165.
- Sentences imposed:
- Life imprisonment and a fine of Php500,000 for illegal sale (Criminal Case No. 06-1837).
- Imprisonment of 12 years and 1 day to 14 years and 8 months and a fine of Php300,000 for illegal possession (Criminal Case No. 06-1838).
- Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Review
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC Decision on July 31, 2008.
- The accused appealed to the Supreme Court, asserting errors related to credibility of prosecution witnesses and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Issues:
- Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the accused-appellant's guilt for violations of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
- Whether there were any irregularities or illegality in the buy-bust operation, such as improper coordination with the PDEA or mistaken identity concerning the accused and "Narciso Sabadlab."
- Whether the penalties imposed were proper under the law.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)