Case Digest (G.R. No. 208837)
Facts:
- Donna Rivera y Dumo was found guilty of illegal sale and possession of methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu) in a buy-bust operation conducted by the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA).
- The incident occurred on January 26, 2009, in the Municipality of Agoo, Province of La Union, Philippines.
- PDEA received information that Rivera was selling drugs in San Nicolas Central, Agoo, La Union.
- A buy-bust team was formed, with Intelligence Officer 2 Jaime Clave acting as the poseur buyer.
- Rivera was arrested after selling shabu to Clave and was found to be in possession of several plastic sachets containing shabu.
- The confiscated items were marked and inventoried, and a laboratory examination confirmed the presence of methamphetamine hydrochloride.
- Rivera pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
The court affirmed the conviction of Rivera for violation of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.
- The court held that the buy-bust operation was conducted lawfully without a warrant because Rivera was caught in the act of committing an offense.
- The court also found that the items seized from Rivera were admissible as evidence because they were recovered during a valid warrantless arrest. ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- In a prosecution for illegal sale of shabu, the elements that must be proved are the identity of the buyer and seller, the object and consideration, and the delivery of the drug and payment.
- To prove illegal possession of a dangerous drug, it must be shown that the accused was in possession of a prohibited drug, such possession was not authorized by law, and the accused was aware of being in possession of the drug.
- The prosecution was able to esta...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 208837)
Facts:
The case involves the conviction of Donna Rivera y Dumo for the illegal sale and possession of methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu) in a buy-bust operation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) finding the appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The case stemmed from two Informations charging the appellant with illegal sale and possession of shabu. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence that a buy-bust operation was conducted based on information received from an informant. The appellant was caught in the act of selling shabu to an undercover police officer. After her arrest, several plastic sachets of shabu were recovered from her possession. The laboratory examination confirmed the presence of methamphetamine hydrochloride in the confiscated items. The trial court found the appellant guilty of both charges and sentenced her accordingly.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is whether the appellant should be convicted for the illegal sale and possession of shabu.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals, sustaining the conviction of the appellant for violation of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
Ratio:
The court ruled that the prosecution was able to pro...