Case Digest (G.R. No. 227013)
Facts:
People of the Philippines v. Aries Reyes y Hilario, Argie Reyes y Hilario, Arthur Hilario, and Demetrio Sahagun y Manalili, G.R. No. 227013, June 17, 2019, the Supreme Court Second Division, Lazaro-Javier, J., writing for the Court. The prosecution (the People) charged Aries H. Reyes and Demetrio M. Sahagun (accused-appellants), together with co-accused Argie Reyes and Arthur Hilario, by Information dated November 28, 2007 with murder for the death of Jun Balmores allegedly occurring on August 5, 2007 in Manila.The incident facts as developed at trial showed that all four men were vendors along Hidalgo Street, Quiapo. An earlier quarrel occurred that morning. In the late afternoon, after Jun returned for a forgotten shoulder bag, several of the accused allegedly pursued him: Demetrio struck him with a plastic chair, Arthur and Aries beat him with broom handles, and Argie intercepted and stabbed Jun twice. Jun was brought to the hospital and declared dead on arrival; the medical/autopsy report attributed death to hypovolemic shock secondary to a stab wound of the trunk. The prosecution presented several eyewitnesses (including Fernando Dela Cruz, Catherine Balmores, Jonalyn Balmores, Mary Ann Nunez), a medico-legal report, and documentary exhibits of expenses and death certificates. The defense witnesses (including the appellants) testified the stabbing was undertaken by Argie alone after a scuffle and that Aries and Demetrio arrived only after the incident; the defense presented no documentary evidence.
The Manila Regional Trial Court (Branch 3) by Decision dated August 27, 2014 convicted Aries and Demetrio of murder, qualified by abuse of superior strength and aggravated by treachery, sentenced them to reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole, and ordered joint and several civil damages (including P75,000 civil indemnity, P32,799.65 actual expenses, P500,000 temperate damages in lieu of loss of earning capacity, P50,000 moral damages, and P35,000 exemplary damages). On appeal, the Office of the Solicitor General defended the murder conviction; appellants questioned proof of conspiracy and the qualifying circumstances.
The Court of Appeals, in CA G.R. CR‑HC No. 07105, rendered a Decision dated March 10, 2016: it affirmed the conviction but modified the damages—finding treachery present, treating abuse of superior strength as absorbed in treachery, reducing actual and exemplary damages and increasing moral damages; it imposed 6% int...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming appellants’ conviction for murder?
- If murder is not proven, what is the proper offense, penalty, and measure of civil and moral...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)