Title
People vs. Remerata
Case
G.R. No. L-6971
Decision Date
Feb 17, 1956
Accused convicted of theft of a rifle; subsequent charge for illegal possession dismissed, citing *autrefois convict*. SC reversed, ruling theft and illegal possession as distinct offenses, allowing separate prosecutions.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 22948)

Facts:

  • Parties and procedural posture
    • THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES was the plaintiff and appellant.
    • PETRONIO REMERATA was the defendant and appellee, convicted of stealing a rifle and later prosecuted for illegal possession of the same firearm.
  • Antecedent events and lower-court action
    • After sentence was imposed for the theft conviction, the Fiscal filed a second information charging illegal possession of the same firearms.
    • PETRONIO REMERATA pleaded autrefois convict and moved for dismissal of the second information.
    • The Court of First Instance of Cotabato, invoking Rule 113, section 9, granted the mot...(Subscriber-Only)

Issues:

  • Whether dismissal under Rule 113, section 9 was proper
    • Whether a prior conviction for theft operates as a bar to subsequent prosecution for illegal possession of the same firearm such that dismissal under Rule 113, section 9 was warranted.
  • Substantive legal questions concerning the elements of the offenses
    • Whether the act of stealing a firearm necessarily constitutes the crime of illegal possession of firearms.
    • Whether an information ch...(Subscriber-Only)

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.