Title
People vs. Rebose
Case
G.R. No. 131104
Decision Date
Jun 17, 1999
Rebose convicted of raping a 12-year-old girl; victim's credible testimony, medical evidence, and intimidation outweighed alibi defense.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 131104)

Facts:

  • Information and charge
    • The appellant, Rizalino P. Rebose, was charged with the crime of rape in Criminal Case No. 95-12116 before the Regional Trial Court of Antipolo, Rizal, Branch 72.
    • The information, dated April 25, 1995, alleged that on or about April 17, 1995 in Antipolo, Rizal, the appellant, by means of force and intimidation while armed with a gun, had carnal knowledge of Lorena B. Rizalte, twelve (12) years of age, against her will and consent.
    • The appellant was arraigned on June 6, 1995 with counsel de oficio, Atty. Danilo Leyble, and pleaded not guilty.
  • Prosecution evidence
    • Lourdes Rizalte, sixty-four (64) years old, testified as grandmother of the victim, Lorena Rizalte, and narrated the circumstances of the incident.
      • On April 17, 1995 at around 9:00 a.m., she asked Lorena to watch the house of Lourdes’ parents located about 15 meters away; Lorena acceded.
      • Upon Lourdes’ return, she became suspicious because Lorena had apparent kiss marks on her neck and acted incoherently.
      • Lorena initially kept silent, but after persistent questioning she confessed that appellant Rebose sexually violated her.
      • Lourdes brought Lorena to Camp Crame for examination; findings revealed that Lorena was physically no longer a virgin.
    • Medico-legal officer Owen Lebaquin of the PNP Crime Laboratory testified regarding the April 19, 1995 examination.
      • He found an ecchymosis or “kiss mark” on Lorena’s neck.
      • He noted healed lacerations on Lorena’s private organ compatible with her allegation of sexual assault.
    • Lorena Rizalte testified on the manner of the assault.
      • She stated that Lourdes told her to check the house at Sitio Panusugin.
      • At the place, she saw appellant Rizalino Rebose with Alex Feliciano and two other unidentified persons.
      • The group allegedly accosted her for wrongdoing attributed to her father, Ricardo Rizalte, and grandfather, Lorenzo Rizalte.
      • Appellant started to kiss her; Alex, described as godson of Lorena’s grandfather, dissuaded appellant, but appellant repulsed him with threats.
      • Alex and the two other companions left.
      • Alone with Lorena, appellant pulled out his gun and ordered her to go inside the house and undress, otherwise she would be killed.
      • After the sexual congress, Lorena was allowed to leave only after appellant sternly warned her not to reveal the incident.
      • Upon returning to Lourdes’ house, Lourdes interrogated Lorena about her kiss marks.
      • Lorena tried to conceal the violation in the presence of barangay officials; after the result of her examination at Camp Crame was released, she admitted that appellant was the culprit.
  • Defense evidence
    • The defense presented Alex Feliciano, Virgilio Pose, Evelina Olaez, Myrna Liwan, and appellant himself.
    • Alex Feliciano testified to an alleged alibi.
      • He denied that he was with appellant and two other persons in Sitio Panusugin on April 17, 1995.
      • He claimed he was at the construction site at No. 176 Wilson Street, San Juan, Manila, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., supported by a photocopy of his daily time record whose original was kept by Virgilio Pose as timekeeper.
      • He stated he had known appellant for three months, being introduced by appellant’s godfather, Lorenzo Rizalte, as pastor of a religious group or sect.
    • Virgilio Pose corroborated the alibi via payroll records.
      • He presented payroll record showing Alex was at the construction site on the day of the alleged rape.
      • He testified that the payroll record was their only basis for wages; thus, if a worker’s name was not logged on a working day, the worker presumably did not render services and was not entitled to wage.
    • Evelina Olaez and Myrna Liwan (both missionaries) testified on appellant’s movements.
      • They stated that on April 16, 1995, appellant briefly attended a Sunday worship in Bontoc, Mountain Province.
      • They testified that appellant asked attendees about the whereabouts of his two friends from Bontoc.
      • After church fellowship, appellant was invited to...(Subscriber-Only)

Issues:

  • Sufficiency of evidence and credibility
    • Whether the prosecution proved appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in view of the defenses of denial, alibi, and lack of credible identification.
  • Alibi and its credibility
    • Whether appellant’s alleged alibi based on presence in Bontoc, Mountain Province on the relevant date was credible.
    • Whether Alex Feliciano and Virgilio Pose established physical impossibility or credible alibi.
  • Medical findings and compatibility with rape
    • Whether the medical report and testimony regarding injuries on the victim were incompatible or insufficient to support the rape charge.
    • Whether the prosecution relied solely on medical findings or whether testimonial evidence independently supported conviction.
  • Elements of statutory rape vs. rape under Article 335(1)
    • Whether the prosecution sufficiently proved the victim’s age as an essential element of statutory rape.
    • Whether, despite lack of proof of age, the eviden...(Subscriber-Only)

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.