Title
People vs. Quitlong
Case
G.R. No. 121562
Decision Date
Jul 10, 1998
Jonathan Calpito was stabbed to death in Baguio City after a dispute with a fishball vendor. Ronnie Quitlong, the stabber, was convicted of murder; Salvador Quitlong and Emilio Senoto Jr. were accomplices. The court ruled based on abuse of superior strength and individual liability.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 121562)

Facts:

  • Case Background
    • On October 20, 1994, an information for murder was filed in the RTC of Baguio City, Branch 5, against Ronnie Quitlong y Frias, Salvador Quitlong y Frias, Emilio Senoto, Jr. y Pascua, and other John Does, for the stabbing death of Jonathan Calpito y Castro.
    • Accused moved for reinvestigation, claiming Jesus Mendoza was the actual stabber; City Prosecutor filed an amended information on December 12, 1994, adding Mendoza as a co-accused.
  • The Stabbing Incident
    • In the evening of October 20, 1994, after a dispute over short change at a fishball stall, Calpito and companion Gosil walked to Harrison Road. Eight men, including the three appellants, approached and cornered Calpito.
    • Witnesses Lito Adjaro and Herbert Soriano saw:
      • Emilio Senoto holding Calpito’s body from behind.
      • Salvador Quitlong holding Calpito’s right hand.
      • Ronnie Quitlong holding Calpito’s left hand and then stabbing him once at the left thorax below the nipple.
    • Police intervention led to the arrest of the three appellants; a bloodstained steel knife (Exh. B) was recovered at the scene.
  • Medical and Ancillary Evidence
    • Victim was rushed to Baguio General Hospital but died at 8:55 PM.
    • Autopsy by Dr. Kathryna Ayro revealed a through-and-through stab wound of the pericardium and left ventricle, causing hypovolemic shock.
    • The family incurred P37,500.00 in funeral expenses; mother Precy Calpito testified to moral suffering.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • Prosecution presented eye-witness testimonies of Adjaro, Soriano, police officers, and the medico-legal officer.
    • Defense admitted appellants’ presence at the scene but denied participation, introducing alibi and witnesses claiming Mendoza was the sole stabber.
    • RTC found appellants acted in conspiracy, convicted all three of murder with indeterminate penalties (20 to 40 years) and awarded civil indemnity, actual and moral damages.

Issues:

  • Whether conspiracy was properly alleged in the information, such that appellants could be convicted as co-principals.
  • Whether the crime charged and proved is murder or only homicide.
  • Whether the trial court erred in convicting the accused-appellants of murder instead of homicide.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.