Title
People vs. Quasha
Case
G.R. No. L-6055
Decision Date
Jun 12, 1953
William H. Quasha acquitted of falsification charges for not disclosing a trustee arrangement in corporate documents, as no legal obligation existed and the Parity Amendment rendered the act non-criminal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-6055)

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • William H. Quasha, a member of the Philippine bar, was charged with falsification of a public and commercial document.
    • He prepared and registered the articles of incorporation of Pacific Airways Corporation.
  • Contents and Registration of Articles
    • On November 4, 1946, articles were filed with the SEC for a domestic corporation as a common carrier by air, land or water.
    • Authorized capital stock was ₱1,000,000 (9,000 preferred shares at ₱100 each, 100,000 common shares at ₱1 each).
    • Subscribed capital was ₱200,000, with the following subscribers:
      • Arsenio Baylon (Filipino) – 1,145 preferred shares (₱114,500) and 6,500 common shares (₱6,500).
      • Five Americans – 200 preferred shares (₱20,000) and 59,000 common shares (₱59,000).
    • Articles stated Baylon owned 60.005% of subscribed capital, though the funds were from the American subscribers, Baylon acting as their trustee.
  • Trial Court Proceedings
    • Quasha was tried under Article 172(1) in connection with Article 171(4) of the Revised Penal Code for “making untruthful statements in a narration of facts.”
    • The trial court found he intended to circumvent Section 8, Article XIV of the Constitution (requiring 60% Filipino capital for public utilities).
    • He was convicted, sentenced to imprisonment and fined, and appealed to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Was Quasha under a legal obligation to disclose in the articles that Baylon was a trustee for the American subscribers?
  • Did Quasha have the wrongful intent to circumvent the constitutional requirement on Filipino ownership of public utilities?
  • If the act was initially punishable, did the March 1947 Parity Amendment render the offense obsolete?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.