Title
People vs. Peralta y Ringor
Case
G.R. No. 128116
Decision Date
Jan 24, 2001
A police officer, Gilbert Peralta, shot and killed Louise Rimando during a confrontation. The Supreme Court convicted him of homicide, rejecting self-defense and treachery claims, and ordered damages to the victim’s heirs.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 124853)

Facts:

  • Accusation and Information
    • On July 3, 1991, in Quezon City, appellant Gilbert Peralta y Ringor was charged with murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, qualified by evident premeditation, treachery, and superior strength.
    • The Information alleged that appellant, with intent to kill, shot Louise Rimando y Medina twice, inflicting mortal wounds.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • Eyewitness testimony (Crizaldo Esguerra, Delfin Soriano, Danilo Gaa):
      • Rimando and three fraternity brothers sought prostitutes at Aberdeen Court Hotel.
      • Appellant, in a taxi, followed them, approached Rimando—who displayed an NBI ID—and after an argument lasting 2–3 minutes, shot him twice while he was seated in the jeep.
    • Medical evidence (Dr. Sergio Alteza, Jr.):
      • Autopsy showed two entry wounds in the right lumbar and lumbar regions, multiple perforations of the jejunum and sigmoid colon, and fatal hemoperitoneum.
      • Bullet trajectories indicated Rimando was seated and vulnerable on his right side.
  • Defense Evidence
    • Appellant’s testimony:
      • A CIC police officer conducting an undercover mission against prostitution, in civilian clothes, armed with a .38 caliber firearm.
      • Attempted to arrest suspected prostitutes; Rimando interposed himself, grabbed appellant’s forearm and gun, and two shots accidentally discharged during a struggle.
    • Supporting testimony (Roberto Reyes):
      • Confirmed appellant warned of arrest, followed the jeep, and engaged in a scuffle over the gun resulting in two accidental shots.
  • Trial Court Decision
    • The Regional Trial Court, Quezon City, Branch 106 (Judge Tabiolo) found appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of murder and imposed reclusion perpetua plus indemnities (₱50,000 civil, ₱57,000 actual, ₱35,000 moral, ₱35,000 exemplary).
  • Appeal and Assignments of Error
    • Self-defense was erroneously rejected.
    • Treachery was improperly appreciated.
    • Credibility of Reyes was unduly disregarded.
    • Civil and moral damages awards were excessive and improper.

Issues:

  • Whether appellant established the justifying circumstance of self-defense.
  • Whether qualifying circumstances of treachery and evident premeditation attended the killing.
  • Whether the trial court erred in discrediting the testimony of Roberto Reyes.
  • Whether appellant’s acts were performed in the lawful exercise of duty as a police officer.
  • Whether the awards for civil indemnity, actual, moral, and exemplary damages were proper.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.