G.R. No. 116744-47 - People vs. Panes

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116744-47)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

Filing of Charges and Initiation of Case

Four informations for murder were filed on September 30, 1987, before the Regional Trial Court, 11th Judicial Region, Branch 26, Surallah, South Cotabato.
The accused were identified as:

Bernardo "Toldo" Panes (at-large, whereabouts unknown)
Manuel Panes
Wilson Velasco
Noel dela Cruz

The informations alleged that on March 13, 1987, at approximately 3:00 p.m., in Purok Baras, Barangay Roxas, Municipality of Sto. Nino, South Cotabato, the accused conspired and acted in concert to commit the crime of murder against four members of the Cocjin family.

The Alleged Crime and Sequence of Events

According to the prosecution’s information, the accused, armed with high-powered firearms and allegedly acting with premeditation, treachery, and taking advantage of superior strength, intentionally attacked the victims.
The victims identified were:

Juanillo Cocjin, Sr.
Steve Cocjin
Conrado Cocjin
Jimmy Cocjin

Incident Details as Testified by Eyewitness Demetrio Paypon, Jr.:

While walking on a farmroad at the boundary of the lands of Juanillo Cocjin, Sr. and Primo Castro, Paypon observed the four Cocjins standing in a plowed field, near the fence of Toldo Panes’ residence.
Toldo Panes was seen running toward the farmroad and signaling by waving his hand toward the house of Diego Tamano, Jr. (his son-in-law).
Shortly thereafter, Manuel Panes, Noel dela Cruz, and Wilson Velasco, each armed with an armalite rifle, emerged from the vicinity of Tamano’s house and approached Toldo Panes, subsequently moving toward the Cocjins.
The attack progressed with Manuel Panes shooting Juanillo Cocjin, Sr. (who was on his knees with raised hands), followed by subsequent shots; similar ruthless actions were observed against the other Cocjin victims.
Other details include:

Jimmy Cocjin running towards his father before being gunned down.
Conrado Cocjin being chased and shot by Noel dela Cruz after a bolo was reportedly used by Toldo Panes.
Wilson Velasco being implicated in the shooting of Steve Cocjin.

Paypon’s clear and unobstructed view (at distances ranging between 30 to 60 meters) of the incident, under a setting with low agricultural vegetation, lent significant credibility to his testimony.

Evidence and Corroborative Testimonies

Eyewitness Testimony:

Demetrio Paypon, Jr.’s account was pivotal, detailing the roles of each accused during the attack.
His testimony highlighted that the victims were unarmed and did not exhibit any imminent threat when attacked.

Autopsy Findings:

Dr. Vincent Dave Farhat, the Municipal Health Officer, performed autopsies on the victims.
Findings included multiple gunshot wounds:

Juanillo Cocjin, Sr. sustained seven bullet wounds.
Jimmy Cocjin sustained three wounds.
Conrado Cocjin was hit twice.
Steve Cocjin sustained a gunshot to the right thigh causing significant arterial damage.

Documentary Evidence:

Affidavit of Demetrio Paypon, Jr. identifying the accused as the perpetrators.
The absence of any recovered bolos, despite defense claims of an alternative altercation involving a carabao and bolos, undermined the accused’s narrative.

Defense Version and Subsequent Trial Developments

Accused’s Explanation:

The accused alleged that they had been patrolling early on March 13, 1987, on Purok Mabuhay, Barangay M. Roxas, due to intelligence of possible hostile activity.
They claimed that during their return, they encountered an incident involving Toldo Panes (recognized by Manuel Panes as his brother) whose carabao had allegedly been hacked by the Cocjins.
According to their version, an altercation ensued leading to shots fired in self-defense.

Inconsistencies in the Defense:

Testimonies by the accused were uncorroborated by other evidence.
Discrepancies were evident when comparing the defense’s account with that of the eyewitness Paypon.
No physical evidence (such as bolos) supported the self-defense narrative.

Court Proceedings and Verdict:

Except for Bernardo “Toldo” Panes (still at-large), the three accused pleaded not guilty.
A joint trial resulted in convictions for murder in four separate cases against Manuel Panes, Noel dela Cruz, and Wilson Velasco, with reclusion perpetua and indemnification of Php50,000 for each victim’s heirs.

Appeal and Appellate Court Decision

Grounds for Appeal:

The accused argued that the trial court erred in finding conspiracy to commit murder.
They disputed the qualification of the crime as murder by treachery.
They maintained that the self-defense and relative defense pleas should have been given credence.

Appellate Court Findings:

The appellate court found no merit in the accused’s arguments.
The clear and consistent eyewitness testimony, along with supporting physical and documentary evidence, fortified the conviction.

Issues:

Whether the trial court erred in its conclusion that the accused conspired and acted in concert in the commission of the murders.
Whether the trial court correctly qualified the killings as murder with the aggravating circumstance of treachery.
Whether the trial court properly rejected the accused’s pleas of self-defense and relative defense given the existing evidence.

Ruling:

(Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

(Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

(Subscriber-Only)

Unlock Full Case Digest

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116744-47) Core Legal Reasoning Model Expanded

Facts:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116744-47) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

Issues:

Ruling:

Ratio:

Doctrine:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116744-47)
Core Legal Reasoning Model

Expanded

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116744-47)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model