Title
People vs. Padilla
Case
G.R. No. 247824
Decision Date
Feb 23, 2022
Two accused convicted of murder for stabbing and dropping a large stone on the victim, with conspiracy and abuse of superior strength proven. Damages adjusted.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 247824)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of the Case
    • On June 18, 2010, an Information was filed against Danilo Padilla and Orlando Padilla for the March 29, 2010 murder of Rhandy Padin in Naguilian, La Union.
    • The charge alleged conspiracy, abuse of superior strength, and the use of a knife and a stone causing fatal injuries with instant death.
  • Pre-trial and Trial Proceedings
    • Arrests and Pleas
      • Danilo was apprehended and jailed on August 16, 2010; he pleaded not guilty.
      • Orlando was arrested on November 4, 2013; he also pleaded not guilty.
    • Witness Testimony
      • Prosecution presented: eyewitness Antonio Villanueva; Parole Officer Nicanor Taron; Dr. Nerino Daciego (medico-legal); Rhandy’s parents; SPO3 Benjamin Costales.
      • Defense presented: Danilo, Orlando, and Romeo Bakate.
  • Prosecution’s Version of Events
    • The brothers hired Antonio’s tricycle to Agoo and later brought him to a videoke bar in Naguilian.
    • A drinking session ensued; Rhandy joined and then all four rode the tricycle again.
    • At Upper Bimmotbot, the accused forcibly removed Rhandy, Danilo stabbed him with a knife, Orlando choked him, and Danilo struck him with a big stone.
    • With Antonio’s help, the accused threw Rhandy’s body and the knife into a ravine.
    • Dr. Daciego’s autopsy: cause of death was blunt traumatic head injury; seven wounds noted.
  • Defense’s Version of Events
    • Danilo and Orlando claimed Antonio initiated the fatal stabbing and stone-blow, with Danilo and Orlando refusing or unaware.
    • Orlando asserted he fled the scene and did not partake in assault or disposal of the body.
  • Lower Courts’ Decisions
    • RTC Decision (November 13, 2018)
      • Convicted both appellants of Murder with abuse of superior strength and conspiracy; sentenced them to reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole.
      • Ordered damages: ₱75,000 death indemnity, ₱100,000 moral damages, ₱50,000 exemplary damages, plus interest and costs; directed reinvestigation of Antonio’s role.
    • CA Decision (February 23, 2022)
      • Affirmed conviction but modified damages to ₱100,000 death indemnity and ₱100,000 exemplary damages each, with legal interest.

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court erred in convicting appellants despite finding that eyewitness Antonio Villanueva stabbed the victim.
  • Whether the court erred in convicting appellants despite concluding Antonio’s testimony was false.
  • Whether conspiracy was correctly held to have attended the crime.
  • Whether the court improperly disregarded appellants’ defense of denial.
  • Whether all elements of Murder under Article 248, RPC, were proven beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the presumption of innocence and rule to resolve doubts in favor of the accused were violated.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.