Title
People vs. Orita
Case
G.R. No. 88724
Decision Date
Apr 3, 1990
Accused convicted of consummated rape after forcibly attempting intercourse at knifepoint; Supreme Court ruled frustrated rape nonexistent, imposed reclusion perpetua.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 149420)

Facts:

  • Antecedent Events
    • On March 20, 1983 at about 1:30 AM inside a boarding house in Borongan, Eastern Samar, appellant Ceilito Orita, a PC soldier, armed himself with a Batangas knife, threatened and forcibly dragged 19-year-old boarder Cristina S. Abayan upstairs via a back door.
    • In her room, with knife pressed to her neck, he undressed both of them and ordered her to remove her clothes.
    • He partially inserted his penis into her vagina in two positions while maintaining physical control and threats.
    • The victim escaped by running through adjacent rooms, scaling partitions, jumping from an approximately eight-meter height, and then, naked and in shock, sought help at the municipal building.
    • Patrolmen Donceras and two others found her naked on the stairs, wrapped her in a jacket, pursued the suspect (who escaped), and brought the victim to Eastern Samar Provincial Hospital.
    • Medical Certificate by Dr. Ma. Luisa Abude (Exh. “A”): circumscribed hematoma on anterior neck; linear abrasions below left breast; multiple pinpoint marks on back; abrasions on both knees; vulva erythematous and tender; intact hymen; no vaginal lacerations; tight vaginal canal with difficulty inserting examining finger.
  • Procedural History
    • RTC, Branch II, Borongan: convicted appellant of frustrated rape (Art. 335, RPC), sentenced to 10½ to 12 years prision mayor, indemnity ₱4,000.00.
    • Court of Appeals (Dec. 29, 1988): modified RTC decision, found appellant guilty of consummated rape, sentenced to reclusion perpetua, indemnity ₱30,000.00.
    • On January 11, 1989, CA set aside its decision and forwarded the case to the Supreme Court under BP 129 §9(3) and Judiciary Act §17(3)(1).

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court erred in disregarding alleged substantial inconsistencies in the testimonies of the victim and Patrolman Donceras.
  • Whether, under the evidence, the proper crime is frustrated rape or consummated rape, given partial penetration.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.