Case Digest (G.R. No. 39086)
Facts:
The People of the Philippine Islands v. Ong Chiat Lay, G.R. No. 39086, October 26, 1934, the Supreme Court, Abad Santos, J., writing for the Court.The provincial fiscal of Zamboanga filed an information charging Ong Chiat Lay and two others, Ong Ban Hua and Kua Sing, with feloniously burning a building that housed a store belonging to Ong Chiat Lay. The three defendants pleaded not guilty and were tried jointly before the trial court. After trial, the court acquitted Ong Ban Hua and Kua Sing but found Ong Chiat Lay guilty of arson and sentenced him to sixteen years and one day of reclusion temporal with accessory penalties, ordered indemnities of P16,000 and P5,000 to Francisco Barrios and Mariano Atienza respectively, and imposed one-third of the costs on the convicted appellant.
On appeal to the Supreme Court, Ong Chiat Lay assigned errors challenging (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the corpus delicti of arson and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The trial court had convicted the appellant largely on circumstantial evidence—circumstances such as his moving of furniture before the fire, alleged indifferent behavior during the fire, his absence from the scene while the building burned, odor of gasoline, and empty cans found on the premises—while his two co-accused were acquitted. The case reached the Supreme Court b...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Was the corpus delicti of arson established by the prosecution below?
- Was the circumstantial evidence presented sufficient to prove Ong Chiat Lay’s guilt beyond reasonab...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)