Title
People vs. O'Cochlain
Case
G.R. No. 229071
Decision Date
Dec 10, 2018
An Irish national was acquitted of marijuana possession due to lapses in the chain of custody and procedural irregularities, casting reasonable doubt on the evidence's integrity.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 229071)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • Accused‐appellant Eanna O’Cochlain, a 53-year-old Irish national married to a Filipina, residing in Barangay Aring, Badoc, Ilocos Norte.
    • Charged by Information dated July 15, 2013 in RTC, Branch 13, Laoag City (Crim. Case No. 15585-13), with illegal possession of two (2) sticks of dried marijuana leaves (0.3824 g), in violation of Sec. 11, Art. II, RA 9165.
  • Circumstances of Arrest and Seizure
    • On July 14, 2013 (~6:35–7:00 p.m.) at the Laoag City Int’l Airport, CAAP CSI Tamayo reported a marijuana odor and saw a Caucasian male “smoking.”
    • SSO Suguitan frisked Eanna at the final security checkpoint with his consent; he produced two Marlboro packs—one contained two rolled sticks of dried leaves.
    • Suguitan displayed the pack to PO1 Manadao Jr. and other personnel; he then handed it to PO3 Javier, who, accompanied by barangay officials and an ABS-CBN cameraman, inventoried and marked the sticks “EO-1” and “EO-2,” photographed them, and bagged them in a Ziploc.
    • Eanna underwent medico-legal exam; specimens were submitted to Ilocos Norte Crime Lab; P/Insp. Navarro’s qualitative test was positive for marijuana.
  • Defense Version
    • Eanna alleged he smoked hand-rolled flavored tobacco outside the initial screening; the two rolled sticks were merely tobacco.
    • He claimed the sticks shown at the station differed in size and wrapping, suggesting evidence switching.
  • Proceedings Below
    • RTC (Nov. 22, 2013) convicted Eanna: 12 years + 1 day to 14 years imprisonment and ₱300,000 fine; held the frisk valid as routine airport security and by consent; found chain of custody intact.
    • CA (Feb. 9, 2016 Decision; July 21, 2016 Res.) affirmed; denied reconsideration.
    • Eanna elevated the case to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Was the warrantless frisk and seizure of the rolled sticks valid under routine airport security procedures and the consent exception?
  • Was there probable cause or reasonable ground to believe Eanna possessed marijuana at the time of frisk?
  • Did the prosecution substantially comply with the chain of custody rule (Sec. 21, RA 9165) to preserve integrity and admit the seized items?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.