Title
People vs. Napoles
Case
G.R. No. 247611
Decision Date
Jan 13, 2021
Napoles, convicted of Plunder, sought release citing COVID-19 risks due to diabetes. SC denied, citing no bail post-conviction for capital offenses, insufficient proof of life-threatening conditions, and domestic law supremacy over international standards.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 247611)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Antecedents
    • On December 7, 2018, the Sandiganbayan Special First Division convicted Richard A. Cambe and Janet Lim Napoles of Plunder (Criminal Case No. SB-14-CRM-0240) for misusing Senator Bong Revilla Jr.’s PDAF and sentenced them to reclusion perpetua.
    • Napoles appealed her conviction to the Supreme Court (G.R. No. 247611) and remained detained at the Correctional Institution for Women (CIW) pending resolution.
  • Napoles’ Motion
    • Napoles filed an Urgent Motion for Recognizance/Bail or House Arrest for Humanitarian Reason Due to COVID-19, alleging she has Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension, placing her at high risk inside the prison.
    • She invoked (a) this Court’s decisions in De La Rama v. People and Enrile v. Sandiganbayan (special medical-health precedents), (b) OCA Circular No. 91-2020 (detention decongestion guidelines), and (c) the Nelson Mandela Rules and international calls for temporary release of PDLs during the pandemic.

Issues:

  • Whether the Constitution and the Rules of Court allow bail pending appeal of a capital-offense conviction.
  • Whether Napoles may be provisionally released on humanitarian grounds due to COVID-19 risk.
  • Whether the Nelson Mandela Rules and international calls for PDL release suffice to grant bail post-conviction.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.