Title
People vs. Munoz
Case
G.R. No. L-38016
Decision Date
Sep 10, 1983
The Supreme Court affirmed the murder conviction of the defendants based on credible evidence and testimonies, establishing their conspiracy.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-38016)

Facts:

  • Case: People of the Philippines vs. Feliciano Munoz and Justo Millora, G.R. No. L-38016.
  • Decision Date: September 10, 1983.
  • Origin: Appeal from the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, Branch XI, Criminal Case No. SCC-172.
  • Accused: Feliciano Munoz (alias "Tony") and Justo Millora (alias "Tito").
  • Charge: Murder of Ricardo Depacina on August 22, 1972, in San Carlos City, Pangasinan.
  • Allegations: Both accused conspired to kill Depacina with evident premeditation and treachery.
  • Incident Details: Munoz shot Depacina in the forehead while Millora was armed and ready.
  • Aftermath: They transported Depacina's body in their patrol jeep to Calasiao, where it was later found.
  • Trial Court Decision: Munoz found guilty and sentenced to death; Millora's sentence suspended due to minority.
  • Arraignment: Both pleaded "Not Guilty" on March 28, 1973.
  • Escape: Munoz escaped from prison on October 11, 1975.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's finding that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Feliciano Munoz shot Ricardo Depacina.
  • The Court ruled that Munoz's confession was admissible and not obtained under duress.
  • The Court held that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies were credible and not contradicted by the defense.
  • The Court found s...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decision based on the credibility of prosecution witnesses, particularly Narciso Rosal, who identified Munoz as the shooter.
  • Minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies did not undermine their overall credibility, especially when they corroborated each other.
  • Munoz's confession was deemed voluntary; he did not provide sufficient evidence of coercion, and the circumstances ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.