Title
People vs. Moreno y Reg
Case
G.R. No. 140033
Decision Date
Jan 25, 2002
A service crew member was robbed and raped by a man she identified; the Supreme Court convicted him of separate crimes of rape and theft, ruling the robbery was an afterthought.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140033)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Incident and Assault
    • On January 8, 1999 at about 12:45 A.M., Marites Felix, a 20-year-old service crew of Burger Machine, was walking along ABC Commercial Complex, Makati, when a man put his arms around her, pointed a fan-knife at her neck, and dragged her to a vacant space behind a parked car.
    • The assailant, later identified as Rogelio Moreno, unbuttoned and removed her clothes, threatened her with further violence, forced her into sexual intercourse, and then, as an afterthought, snatched her shoulder bag containing cash (₱200), an ATM card, coupons, a Bible, toiletries, and a T-shirt.
  • Identification, Arrest, and Medical Examination
    • Under street and complex lights, Marites noticed tattoos on the assailant’s arms and recognized him as Rogelio, who frequently passed by her outlet wearing a Burger Machine T-shirt. Police later found her gold ring at the crime scene and traced Rogelio to Laperal Compound, where he was hiding in a house wearing the victim’s T-shirt. Marites positively identified him.
    • At the Makati police station and the NBI medico-legal office, Marites underwent investigation. Dr. Villena found breast contusions, an intact but distensible hymen, and positive human spermatozoa, indicating recent intercourse.
  • Defense, Trial, and RTC Decision
    • Rogelio pleaded alibi, claiming he was sleeping outside his uncle’s house in Laperal Compound; a neighbor testified he saw him playing basketball hours earlier and then sleeping.
    • The Regional Trial Court, Branch 138, Makati City, found Rogelio guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the special complex crime of robbery with rape, applied the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity, imposed the death penalty, and ordered moral damages of ₱200,000 and restitution of ₱1,000.

Issues:

  • Sufficiency and Classification of the Evidence
    • Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Rogelio committed robbery with rape as a special complex crime.
    • Whether the taking of the victim’s property was part of an original plan or merely an afterthought.
  • Constitutional Rights and Aggravation
    • Whether Rogelio’s right to counsel and to remain silent was violated during his arrest and custodial investigation.
    • Whether the court properly appreciated nighttime (nocturnity) as an aggravating circumstance.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.